share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Ingredion Incorporated's (NYSE:INGR) Recent US$707m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Ingredion Incorporated's (NYSE:INGR) Recent US$707m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構投資者可能會忽略宜瑞安公司(紐交所: INGR)最近的70700萬美元市值下降,因爲長期利潤保持良好
Simply Wall St ·  11/19 19:03

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ingredion's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 顯著較高的機構持有比例意味着宜瑞安的股票價格對其交易行爲敏感。
  • 前15大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

Every investor in Ingredion Incorporated (NYSE:INGR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 89% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位宜瑞安公司(紐交所:INGR)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的群體是機構,佔有89%的份額。換句話說,該群體從對公司的投資中將獲得最多的收益(或承受最大的損失)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 7.2% in value last week. However, the 38% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧損,尤其是那些上週其持股價值下降了7.2%的機構投資者。然而,對於股東來說,38%的年度回報可能緩解了損失。不過,我們會假設他們會關注未來的弱點。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ingredion.

在下面的圖表中,我們詳細查看了宜瑞安的不同持股群體。

big
NYSE:INGR Ownership Breakdown November 19th 2024
紐交所:INGR 持股分解 2024年11月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ingredion?

機構持股告訴我們關於宜瑞安什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Ingredion already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ingredion, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

宜瑞安的股份登記中已經有機構投資者。實際上,他們在公司的股份相當可觀。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經審視過這隻股票並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查宜瑞安過去的盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:INGR Earnings and Revenue Growth November 19th 2024
紐交所:INGR 盈利與營業收入增長 2024年11月19日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Ingredion is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 4.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。 宜瑞安不被對沖基金持有。 先鋒集團目前是該公司的最大股東,持有11%的流通股。 分別持有10%和4.1%的流通股,貝萊德和維度基金顧問分別是第二和第三大股東。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的股權拆分數據表明,前15大股東持有的股權總和爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Ingredion

宜瑞安的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Ingredion Incorporated in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$45m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己名義持有的宜瑞安公司的股份不足1%。由於它是一家大公司,我們只希望內部人士擁有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有4500萬美元的股份。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人士是否有在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Ingredion. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆持有11%的股份,這些一般公衆主要由個人投資者組成,他們在宜瑞安公司中擁有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不能決定所有事項,但顯然會對公司的運行產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論