share_log

With 87% Ownership, Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE:TRN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 87% Ownership, Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE:TRN) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

三一工業公司(紐交所:TRN)擁有87%的股份,展示出強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  11/19 18:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Trinity Industries' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 6 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 鑑於機構在該股票的巨大持股,trinity industries的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前6大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

A look at the shareholders of Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE:TRN) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看trinity industries, inc. (紐交所:TRN) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有87%的股份。換句話說,這個群體在他們對公司的投資中最有可能獲得最大收益(或遭受最大損失)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Trinity Industries.

在下圖中,我們聚焦於trinity industries的不同持有群體。

big
NYSE:TRN Ownership Breakdown November 19th 2024
紐交所:TRN 持有情況 2024年11月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Trinity Industries?

機構持有情況告訴我們什麼關於trinity industries?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Trinity Industries. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Trinity Industries' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在trinity industries中持有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好對依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看trinity industries的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:TRN Earnings and Revenue Growth November 19th 2024
紐交所:TRN 2024年11月19日的營業收入和增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Trinity Industries. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.8% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對trinity industries的對沖基金沒有顯著投資。貝萊德公司目前是最大的股東,持有16%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約12%和6.8%的股票。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以加深對股票預期表現的全面了解也是一個好習慣。雖然有部分分析師的覆蓋,但該公司可能沒有受到廣泛的關注。因此,在未來可能會受到更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Trinity Industries

trinity industries的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Trinity Industries, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$46m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告,內部人士確實持有trinity industries, Inc.的股份。內部人士擁有價值4600萬美元的重大股份。大多數人會將其視爲一個真正的積極信號。如果您想探討內部人對齊的問題,您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Trinity Industries. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆,通常是個別投資者,持有trinity industries的12%股份。雖然這個群體不一定能掌控決定,但確實可以對公司如何運行產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Trinity Industries has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

我發現了解誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險 - Trinity Industries 有 3 個警告信號(還有 1 個不能忽視的)我們認爲你應該了解。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論