Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) Gained 24%, Institutions Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) Gained 24%, Institutions Profited as Well
Key Insights
主要見解
- IonQ's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 38% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- IonQ的重要個人投資者所有權表明關鍵決策受更大公衆股東的影響
- 前25名股東持有該業務的38%。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着IonQ公司(紐交所:IONQ),那麼您需要看一下其股權登記簿的構成。個人投資者持有54%的股份,是公司中持股最多的人群。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While individual investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 24% price gain, institutions also received a 36% cut.
儘管個人投資者在上週股價上漲24%後獲益最多,但機構也獲得了36%的股份。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about IonQ.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對IonQ有什麼可以告訴我們的。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About IonQ?
機構投資者的持股情況告訴我們關於IonQ的什麼信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that IonQ does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see IonQ's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到IonQ確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總有可能存在『擁擠的交易』風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到IonQ的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事永遠沒有止境。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in IonQ. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.8%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.5% and 3.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
對IonQ而言,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有9.8%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有6.5%和3.4%的流通股。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of IonQ
IonQ的內部股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in IonQ, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$565m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據表明,一些內部人士擁有IonQ, Inc.的股份。內部人士持有價值56500萬美元的資產,大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。大多數人會認爲這顯示了股東和董事會之間利益的一致性。不過,值得注意的是,這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 54% of IonQ. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
IonQ的54%股權歸屬於一般公衆,包括零售投資者。這種所有權水平賦予來自更廣泛公衆的投資者某種影響力,以影響董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付比率等關鍵政策決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand IonQ better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with IonQ (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
始終值得考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解IonQ,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮一下投資風險這個永遠存在的威脅。我們已經確認了IonQ的3個警示信號(至少有1個有點不愉快),了解它們應該成爲您的投資過程中的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。