Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 67% of the Company
Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 67% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Duke Energy implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在杜克能源的重大持股意味着他們對公司股價有顯著影響。
- 前25名股東持有43%的業務。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 67% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着杜克能源公司(紐交所:DUK),理解業務的所有權結構是重要的。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有67%股份的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲益最多(或者在下滑時損失最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Duke Energy, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討杜克能源的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Duke Energy?
機構持股告訴我們杜克能源的哪些信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Duke Energy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Duke Energy, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到杜克能源確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的大部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴於這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,和其他人一樣。我們並不罕見地看到,如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出股票,股價會驟然下跌。因此,查看杜克能源過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Duke Energy. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.3% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.6% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 5.2% of the company stock.
投資者應注意,機構實際擁有公司的超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同發揮顯著的權力。我們注意到,對杜克能源的對沖基金並沒有進行重要投資。先鋒集團目前是最大的股東,擁有9.3%的流通股。黑石集團是第二大股東,持有7.6%的普通股,而道富銀行全球顧問公司持有約5.2%的公司股票。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Duke Energy
杜克能源的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that Duke Energy Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$121m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的信息顯示,杜克能源公司的內部人士持有的股份少於1%。這是一個非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士持有公司大比例的股份會令人驚訝。雖然他們的持股總額不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員總共持有價值12100萬美元的股票(以當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 33% stake in Duke Energy. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有杜克能源33%的股份。雖然這樣的持股比例可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Duke Energy you should be aware of, and 1 of them can't be ignored.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是很重要的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。 例如:我們發現了杜克能源的3個警告信號,你應該了解,其中1個是不能忽視的。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。