Does PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that PepsiCo, Inc. (NASDAQ:PEP) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
傳奇基金經理李路(查理·芒格支持的投資者)曾經說過:『最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受資本的永久損失。』在你審視一個公司有多大風險時,考慮其資產負債表是完全自然的,因爲當一個業務崩潰時,往往涉及債務。我們可以看到百事可樂公司(納斯達克:PEP)確實在其業務中使用債務。但真正的問題是,這筆債務是否使得公司變得風險很大。
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
當企業無法輕易地通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資本來履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債變得風險較高。如果公司不能履行其償還債務的法定義務,則股東可能會什麼都得不到。然而,更普遍(但仍很痛苦)的情況是,公司必須以低價募集新股權資本,從而永久稀釋股東的權益。話雖如此,最普遍的情況是公司合理地管理其債務,並獲得自己的優勢。當考慮企業使用多少債務時,首要的是同時查看其現金和債務。
What Is PepsiCo's Net Debt?
百事可樂的淨債務是多少?
As you can see below, PepsiCo had US$45.0b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. On the flip side, it has US$8.05b in cash leading to net debt of about US$37.0b.
正如您下面所看到的,截止2024年9月,百事可樂的債務爲450億美元,與你前一年大致相同。您可以點擊圖表以獲取更多細節。另一方面,它有80.5億美元的現金,因此淨債務約爲370億美元。
How Strong Is PepsiCo's Balance Sheet?
百事可樂的資產負債表有多強?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that PepsiCo had liabilities of US$30.3b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$50.6b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$8.05b and US$12.1b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$60.8b.
細看最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到百事可樂的短期負債爲303億美元,長期負債爲506億美元。另一方面,它擁有現金爲80.5億美元,且有121億美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,它的負債比現金及(短期)應收賬款的總和多出608億美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since PepsiCo has a huge market capitalization of US$217.6b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
雖然這看起來很多,但並不是那麼糟糕,因爲百事可樂的市場資本化高達2176億美元,因此如果需要,它可能通過融資來增強資產負債表。但是我們當然希望保持警惕,關注其債務帶來的過多風險的跡象。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。
PepsiCo's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 2.2 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its commanding EBIT of 15.3 times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. We saw PepsiCo grow its EBIT by 4.2% in the last twelve months. Whilst that hardly knocks our socks off it is a positive when it comes to debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if PepsiCo can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
百事可樂的淨債務與EBITDA比率約爲2.2,表明其債務使用適度。它的EBIT是利息支出的15.3倍,意味着債務負擔輕如孔雀羽毛。我們看到百事可樂在過去12個月中EBIT增長了4.2%。儘管這並不讓我們大吃一驚,但在債務方面是個積極的信號。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是開始的地方。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定百事可樂能否隨着時間的推移增強其資產負債表。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份免費報告,顯示分析師的利潤預測。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, PepsiCo recorded free cash flow of 49% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,公司只能用冷硬現金償還債務,而不是會計利潤。因此,值得檢查一下EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。從最近三年來看,百事可樂的自由現金流佔EBIT的49%,這比我們預期的要弱。這在償還債務方面並不是很好。
Our View
我們的觀點
On our analysis PepsiCo's interest cover should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit handle its debt, based on its EBITDA,. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that PepsiCo is managing its debt quite well. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for PepsiCo that you should be aware of.
根據我們的分析,百事可樂的利息保障應表明其在債務方面不會遇到太多問題。但我們上述提到的其他因素並不那麼令人鼓舞。例如,依據其EBITDA,似乎它在處理債務上有些掙扎。當我們考慮上述所有因素時,我們認爲百事可樂在管理其債務方面做得相當不錯。但有一點需要提醒的是:我們認爲債務水平已經足夠高,需要持續監測。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。然而,投資風險並不完全體現在資產負債表上,遠非如此。例如,我們已識別出百事可樂的兩個警示信號,你需要注意。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
當一切塵埃落定時,有時更容易專注於那些甚至不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費查看零淨債務的成長股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。