Institutions Along With Private Equity Firms Who Hold Considerable Shares InRackspace Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:RXT) Come Under Pressure; Lose 12% of Holdings Value
Institutions Along With Private Equity Firms Who Hold Considerable Shares InRackspace Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:RXT) Come Under Pressure; Lose 12% of Holdings Value
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Rackspace Technology by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 57% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Apollo Global Management, Inc.)
- 22% of Rackspace Technology is held by Institutions
- 私募股權公司對rackspace technology的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策方面擁有更大的影響力。
- 57%的公司股份由單一股東(阿波羅全球管理公司)持有。
- 22%的rackspace technology股份由機構持有。
If you want to know who really controls Rackspace Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:RXT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private equity firms own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了rackspace technology公司(納斯達克:RXT),那麼你需要查看其股份登記的構成。我們可以看到,私募股權公司在該公司中擁有大部分股份,持有57%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
While the holdings of private equity firms took a hit after last week's 12% price drop, institutions with their 22% holdings also suffered.
雖然私募股權公司在上週12%的價格下跌後受到了影響,但持有22%股份的機構也遭受了損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Rackspace Technology.
在下面的圖表中,我們關注rackspace technology的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rackspace Technology?
機構持股對rackspace technology的意義是什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Rackspace Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Rackspace Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在rackspace technology中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經觀察了這隻股票並且喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時售出股票,股票價格大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看rackspace technology過去的營業收入軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要考慮其他因素。
Rackspace Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Apollo Global Management, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 57% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.0% and 4.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Amar Maletira directly holds 2.2% of the total shares outstanding.
rackspace technology並不被對沖基金持有。 阿波羅全球管理公司目前是該公司的最大股東,持有57%的流通股。 由於其在所有權中佔有如此巨大的股份,我們推測他們對公司未來具有重要的控制權。 同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有6.0%和4.3%的流通股。此外,該公司的首席執行官Amar Maletira直接持有2.2%總流通股。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Rackspace Technology
rackspace technology的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Rackspace Technology, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$54m worth of stock in the US$551m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告內部人士確實擁有rackspace technology, inc.的股票。內部人士以自己名義持有價值5400萬美元的股票,所涉及的公司總價值爲55100萬美元。這至少顯示出某種程度的契合。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Rackspace Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,一般是個人投資者,持有rackspace technology 11%的股份。這個持股比例雖然相當可觀,但如果與其他大型股東的決策不同,可能並不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 57%, private equity firms could influence the Rackspace Technology board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
擁有57%股份的股權投資公司可以影響rackspace technology的董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲股權投資有時是激進者,會讓管理層承擔責任。但有時,股權投資也會選擇售出,將公司上市。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Rackspace Technology (1 is concerning) that you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如,我們已經確定了rackspace technology的3個警告信號(其中一個讓人擔憂),你應該了解這些。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。