share_log

Toll Brothers, Inc.'s (NYSE:TOL) Institutional Investors Lost 3.1% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

Toll Brothers, Inc.'s (NYSE:TOL) Institutional Investors Lost 3.1% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains

托爾兄弟公司(紐交所:TOL)的機構投資者在過去一週損失了3.1%,但從長期收益中獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  11/16 22:19

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Toll Brothers' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構擁有的股份比例高意味着托爾兄弟的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感
  • 前15名股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Toll Brothers, Inc. (NYSE:TOL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 88% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看漲托爾兄弟股票的股東情況可以告訴我們哪一群體更具影響力。我們可以看到,機構在該公司中擁有佔比最多的股份,佔有88%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這一群體將獲益最大(或者在出現下行時損失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.1% in value last week. However, the 79% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧錢,尤其是機構投資者,在上週看到他們的持股價值下降了3.1%。然而,一年內股東的79%的回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。然而,他們應當警惕未來可能的進一步損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Toll Brothers, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究托爾兄弟的每一類型所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:TOL Ownership Breakdown November 16th 2024
紐交所:TOL所有權拆分 2024年11月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Toll Brothers?

機構持股告訴我們關於托爾兄弟的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Toll Brothers. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Toll Brothers' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在托爾兄弟中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在它們涉及的'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相迅速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以在下面看到托爾兄弟的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更復雜的。

big
NYSE:TOL Earnings and Revenue Growth November 16th 2024
紐交所:TOL 2024年11月16日營收增長和收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Toll Brothers. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司股份超過50%,因此他們可能會共同對董事會決策產生強烈影響。對於托爾兄弟,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是BlackRock,Inc.,持有13%的流通股。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的11%和5.5%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前15名股東在該公司中擁有51%的股權,這表明沒有單個股東對該公司具有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Toll Brothers

托爾兄弟的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that Toll Brothers, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$84m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

根據我們的信息顯示,托爾兄弟公司內部持有公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,所以看到內部人員持有大量公司股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員集體持有價值8400萬美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但值得檢查的是這些內部人員是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

廣大公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的持股,因此不能被輕視。雖然這個群體不能決定掌控權,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Toll Brothers better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Toll Brothers .

始終值得考慮一家公司的不同股東群體。但爲了更好地了解托爾兄弟,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的托爾兄弟存在1個警示信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論