Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE:PRU) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 60% of the Company
Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE:PRU) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 60% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Prudential Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 41% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 考慮到機構在股票中持有的大宗股份,保德信金融的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
- 前25名股東持有41%的業務。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
Every investor in Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE:PRU) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 60% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
每位在保德信金融公司(NYSE:PRU)投資的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。擁有60%股份,機構在該公司中持有最多股票。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Prudential Financial.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關保德信金融的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Prudential Financial?
機構持股告訴我們關於保德信金融的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Prudential Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Prudential Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,保德信金融確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總是存在它們可能處於'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到保德信金融的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Prudential Financial. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.8% by the third-largest shareholder.
機構投資者擁有超過公司50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會決策。我們注意到,對保德信金融沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是先鋒集團,Inc.擁有12%的流通股。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.8%的流通股,第三大股東持有約4.8%的所有流通股。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Prudential Financial
保德信金融的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Prudential Financial, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$96m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息顯示,保德信金融公司內部持有不到公司1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部持有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值9600萬美元的股票。看到至少有一些內部持股總是好事,但也值得注意的是他們是否一直在出售股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in Prudential Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在保德信金融中持有40%的股份。儘管這一持股規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致的話,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Prudential Financial .
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該注意我們在保德信金融發現的1個警示信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。