Can CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE:CAVA) Improve Its Returns?
Can CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE:CAVA) Improve Its Returns?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). We'll use ROE to examine CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE:CAVA), by way of a worked example.
許多投資者仍在課堂各種有助於分析股票的指標。本文適合那些想了解股東權益回報率(roe)的人。我們將通過一個實例使用roe來分析CAVA集團(紐交所:CAVA)。
Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.
對於股東來說,股東回報率(ROE)是一個重要的考慮因素,因爲它告訴股東他們的資本被有效地再投資了多少。換句話說,它是一個衡量公司股東提供的資本回報率的盈利能力比率。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算淨資產收益率?
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
roe可以通過以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(來自持續經營) ÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for CAVA Group is:
因此,根據上述公式,CAVA Group的ROE爲:
8.7% = US$54m ÷ US$616m (Based on the trailing twelve months to October 2024).
8.7% = US$5400萬 ÷ US$61600萬 (基於截至2024年10月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the yearly profit. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.09 in profit.
「回報」是年度利潤。 一種觀點是:對於每$1的股東資本,公司獲得$0.09的利潤。
Does CAVA Group Have A Good ROE?
CAVA集團的roe表現如何?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. As shown in the graphic below, CAVA Group has a lower ROE than the average (14%) in the Hospitality industry classification.
通過將公司的roe與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其表現。 這種方法的侷限性在於,一些公司即使在同一行業分類下也與其他公司有很大不同。 如下圖所示,CAVA集團的roe低於酒店行業分類的平均水平(14%)。
Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books.
不幸的是,這是次優的。然而,低ROE並不總是不好。如果公司的債務水平適中或較低,則仍有可能通過使用財務槓桿來改善回報。對於具有高債務且ROE低的公司,則完全是另外一回事,是我們書中的高風險投資。
The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity
債務對股本回報率的重要性
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.
幾乎所有公司都需要資金來投資業務,以增加利潤。這筆資金可以來自發行股份、留存盈餘或債務。在前兩種情況下,ROE將反映出這筆現金用於投資業務。而在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將提高回報,但不會影響總資產。因此,債務的使用將推動ROE,即使業務的核心經濟模式保持不變。
CAVA Group's Debt And Its 8.7% ROE
CAVA集團的債務及其8.7%的roe
CAVA Group is free of net debt, which is a positive for shareholders. So although its ROE isn't that impressive, we shouldn't judge it harshly on that metric, because it didn't use debt. At the end of the day, when a company has zero debt, it is in a better position to take future growth opportunities.
CAVA集團沒有淨債務,這對股東來說是個積極信號。雖然它的roe不算特別出色,但我們不應該對這個指標過於苛責,因爲它沒有使用債務。最終,當一家公司沒有債務時,它在把握未來增長機會方面處於更好的位置。
Summary
總結
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. All else being equal, a higher ROE is better.
股本回報率在比較不同企業質量時很有用。一家可以在沒有債務的情況下實現高股本回報率的公司可以被認爲是一家高質量的公司。其他條件相同,股本回報率越高,越好。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是當業務的質量很高時,市場往往會將其推向反映這一點的價格。與股價反映的預期相比,利潤增長率尤爲重要。因此,您可能想要查看這家公司豐富數據的交互式預測圖表。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您也可能通過尋找其他地方來找到出色的投資。因此,不妨查看這個有趣公司的免費列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。