Statutory Profit Doesn't Reflect How Good Vital Farms' (NASDAQ:VITL) Earnings Are
Statutory Profit Doesn't Reflect How Good Vital Farms' (NASDAQ:VITL) Earnings Are
Vital Farms, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:VITL) earnings announcement last week was disappointing for investors, despite the decent profit numbers. We did some digging and actually think they are being unnecessarily pessimistic.
Vital Farms, Inc.(納斯達克:VITL)上週的業績對投資者來說令人失望,儘管利潤數字還不錯。我們做了一些調查,實際上認爲他們過於悲觀了。
Zooming In On Vital Farms' Earnings
聚焦Vital Farms的收益
One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.
用於衡量公司將其盈利轉換成自由現金流(FCF)的一個關鍵財務比率是應計比率。爲了得出應計比率,我們首先從一個期間的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以期間的平均經營資產。這個比率告訴我們公司利潤有多少不受自由現金流支持。
That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.
這意味着負的應計比率是一件好事,因爲它表明公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所顯示的更多。雖然擁有正的應計比率並不是問題,表明一定程度的非現金利潤,但高應計比率可能是一件壞事,因爲這表明紙面利潤不能得到現金流支持。這是因爲一些學術研究表明,高應計比率往往導致較低的利潤或利潤增長率。
Over the twelve months to September 2024, Vital Farms recorded an accrual ratio of -0.12. That implies it has good cash conversion, and implies that its free cash flow solidly exceeded its profit last year. To wit, it produced free cash flow of US$61m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of US$50.0m. Vital Farms' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see. Notably, the company has issued new shares, thus diluting existing shareholders and reducing their share of future earnings.
截至2024年9月的12個月內,Vital Farms的應計比率爲-0.12。這意味着它的現金轉化良好,也意味着去年的自由現金流大大超過了利潤。具體來說,在此期間,它產生了6100萬美元的自由現金流,遠超過報告的5000萬美元的利潤。Vital Farms的自由現金流在過去一年中有所改善,這通常是好事。值得注意的是,公司已發行新股,從而稀釋了現有股東,減少了他們未來收益的份額。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
To understand the value of a company's earnings growth, it is imperative to consider any dilution of shareholders' interests. In fact, Vital Farms increased the number of shares on issue by 5.3% over the last twelve months by issuing new shares. That means its earnings are split among a greater number of shares. To celebrate net income while ignoring dilution is like rejoicing because you have a single slice of a larger pizza, but ignoring the fact that the pizza is now cut into many more slices. Check out Vital Farms' historical EPS growth by clicking on this link.
要理解公司的盈利增長價值,考慮股東權益的稀釋是至關重要的。實際上,vital farms在過去十二個月中通過發行新股增加了5.3%的流通股數。這意味着它的收益分攤在更多的股票上。慶祝淨利潤而忽視稀釋,就像高興地說你吃到了更大比薩的一片,但忽視了比薩已經被切成了更多片。點擊這個鏈接查看vital farms的歷史每股收益增長。
How Is Dilution Impacting Vital Farms' Earnings Per Share (EPS)?
稀釋是如何影響vital farms的每股收益(EPS)的?
As it happens, we don't know how much the company made or lost three years ago, because we don't have the data. The good news is that profit was up 144% in the last twelve months. On the other hand, earnings per share are only up 136% over the same period. And so, you can see quite clearly that dilution is influencing shareholder earnings.
實際上,我們不知道這家公司三年前的獲利或虧損情況,因爲我們沒有數據。好消息是,過去十二個月的利潤增長了144%。另一方面,每股收益在同一時期僅增長了136%。因此,可以清楚地看到稀釋正在影響股東的收益。
Changes in the share price do tend to reflect changes in earnings per share, in the long run. So it will certainly be a positive for shareholders if Vital Farms can grow EPS persistently. However, if its profit increases while its earnings per share stay flat (or even fall) then shareholders might not see much benefit. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.
長期來看,股價變化往往反映了每股收益的變化。因此,如果vital farms能夠持續增長EPS,將對股東非常有利。然而,如果它的利潤增長而每股收益保持不變(甚至下降),那麼股東可能不會看到太多好處。因此,可以說,在長期內,如果目標是評估公司的股價是否可能增長,每股收益比淨利潤更重要。
Our Take On Vital Farms' Profit Performance
我們對Vital Farms的盈利表現的看法
At the end of the day, Vital Farms is diluting shareholders which will dampen earnings per share growth, but its accrual ratio showed it can back up its profits with free cash flow. After taking into account all these factors, we think that Vital Farms' statutory results are a decent reflection of its underlying earnings power. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Vital Farms you should be aware of.
到頭來,vital farms正在稀釋股東,這將抑制每股收益的增長,但其累計比率顯示它可以用自由現金流來支撐其利潤。在考慮到所有這些因素後,我們認爲vital farms的法定結果是其基本盈利能力的合理反映。因此,如果您想對該公司進行更多分析,了解相關風險是至關重要的。值得注意的是:我們發現了1個需要注意的警告信號。
Our examination of Vital Farms has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
我們對vital farms的研究集中在一些可以讓其盈利看起來比實際更好的因素上。但是,如果你能夠專注於細節,總會有更多的發現。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利業務經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡"跟隨資金",尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。因此,你可能想查看這份高股本回報率公司的免費彙總,或者這份內部持股高的股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。