share_log

With 80% Ownership in Philip Morris International Inc. (NYSE:PM), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 80% Ownership in Philip Morris International Inc. (NYSE:PM), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

機構投資者持有菲利普莫里斯國際公司(紐交所:PM)80%的股份,揹負着巨額的業務風險。
Simply Wall St ·  11/15 19:12

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Philip Morris International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構在菲利普莫里斯的 substantial holdings 表明他們對公司股價有重要影響。
  • 總共有16家投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔50%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls Philip Morris International Inc. (NYSE:PM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 80% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制菲利普莫里斯國際公司(紐交所:PM),那你就必須看看其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有80%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,這些機構將獲得最大的利益(或者在出現下滑時損失最多)。

Last week's 3.6% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 48% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週3.6%的收益意味着機構投資者在這個譜系的正面,即使公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢。 一年來對股東的回報目前爲48%,而上週的收益是爲此錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Philip Morris International.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於菲利普莫里斯的不同持有群體。

big
NYSE:PM Ownership Breakdown November 15th 2024
紐交所:Pm持股分解2024年11月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Philip Morris International?

機構持股告訴我們關於菲利普莫里斯的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Philip Morris International. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Philip Morris International's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者在菲利普莫里斯佔有相當的股份。這可以表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好對依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構在同一時間改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看以下菲利普莫里斯的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。

big
NYSE:PM Earnings and Revenue Growth November 15th 2024
紐交所:菲利普莫里斯收益與營業收入增長 2024年11月15日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Philip Morris International. Capital Research and Management Company is currently the largest shareholder, with 18% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.8% and 6.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者持有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會對董事會的決策產生較大影響。對沖基金在菲利普莫里斯的股份不多。資本研究與管理公司目前是最大股東,持有18%的流通股。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有8.8%和6.4%的流通股。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們的所有權數字顯示,前16名股東的所有權總計佔50%,這意味着沒有單一股東佔有多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Philip Morris International

菲利普莫里斯的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Philip Morris International Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$290m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,菲利普莫里斯國際公司內部人士擁有公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有大比例股份是令人驚訝的。儘管他們的持有量少於1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值29000萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。可以說,近期的買入和賣出同樣重要。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否有買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Philip Morris International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆擁有20%的股份,主要由個人投資者構成,對菲利普莫里斯國際有一定的影響力。雖然這一股權比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Philip Morris International you should know about.

我發現了解誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有這些風險,我們發現了 2 個關於菲利普莫里斯的警告信號 你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論