share_log

Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 69% of the Company

Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 69% of the Company

Provident Financial Services, Inc. (紐交所:PFS) 受到持有公司69%股份的機構股東的青睞
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/14 19:37

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Provident Financial Services' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 鑑於機構在股票中持有大部分股權, provident financial services的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 前15大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

Every investor in Provident Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE:PFS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 69% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

每位投資者都應該意識到紐交所:PFS的股東中最強大的股東群體。持有最多股份的是機構,擁有69%的股權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Provident Financial Services.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了對 Provident Financial Services 不同所有權集團的觀察。

big
NYSE:PFS Ownership Breakdown November 14th 2024
紐交所:PFS 2024年11月14日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Provident Financial Services?

機構持有權告訴我們有關 Provident Financial Services 的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Provident Financial Services already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Provident Financial Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Provident Financial Services 已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有一定比例的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某隻股票,股價大跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查 Provident Financial Services 的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
NYSE:PFS Earnings and Revenue Growth November 14th 2024
紐約證券交易所:PFS盈利和營業收入增長2024年11月14日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Provident Financial Services. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對於Provident Financial Services,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。BlackRock,Inc.目前是該公司最大的股東,持有13%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的11%和5.9%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前15名股東在公司中擁有50%的組合持股,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Provident Financial Services

提供者金融服務內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Provident Financial Services, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$95m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到,內部持有人擁有Provident Financial Services股票。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是很好的。內部持有人擁有價值9500萬美元的股份(以當前價格計算)。看到內部持有人有這種投資水平是一件好事。您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Provident Financial Services. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Provident Financial Services持有28%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Provident Financial Services (of which 1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) you should know about.

我發現查看公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了provident financial services的5個警告信號(其中1個讓我們有點不舒服!)你應該了解。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論