Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Market Cap Surged S$80m Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Market Cap Surged S$80m Last Week, Private Companies Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Haw Par by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Haw Par is 29%
- 私營企業對虎豹企業的顯著控制意味着公衆在管理和治理決策方面有更大的影響力。
- 共有4位投資者持有廣東神嶺環保系統的多數股權,佔有54%的所有權。
- 虎豹企業的機構持股比例爲29%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Haw Par Corporation Limited (SGX:H02), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制虎豹企業(新加坡交易所:H02),必須了解該業務的所有權結構。我們可以看到,私營企業在該公司中擁有最大份額,持股比例爲37%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多的收益(或遭受最多的損失)。
As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 3.3% gain.
因此,私營公司是上週3.3%漲幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Haw Par.
在下面的圖表中,我們關注虎豹企業不同的持有群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haw Par?
機構持股告訴我們關於虎豹企業什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Haw Par already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Haw Par's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
虎豹企業已經在股東名冊上有機構存在。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構共同持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個參與方可能會爭相快速賣出股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到虎豹企業的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是比表面上看起來要複雜。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Haw Par. The company's largest shareholder is Wee Investments Pte Ltd, with ownership of 28%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 9.8% of the stock.
對沖基金在虎豹企業的股份不多。公司的最大股東是Wee Investments Pte Ltd,持股28%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約10%和9.8%的股票。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Haw Par
虎豹企業的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that Haw Par Corporation Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own S$14m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息顯示,虎豹企業的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。然而,我們注意到,內部人士可能通過私營公司或其他公司結構間接持有股份。這是一家大公司,因此,即使是小比例的利益也可以在董事會和股東之間產生一致性。在這種情況下,內部人士持有價值1400萬新元的股份。看到至少一些內部人持股總是好的,但值得檢查這些內部人士是否在出售股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in Haw Par. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個體投資者,持有虎豹企業32%的股份。雖然這樣的持股比例可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 37%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據表明,私營公司佔公司股份的37%。 這值得進一步研究。 如果相關方,例如內部人士,對其中一個私營公司有利益,那麼這應該披露在年度報告中。 私營公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Haw Par you should be aware of.
我發現查看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得深入了解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 舉個例子:我們發現了一個有關虎豹企業的警告信號,你應該注意一下。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。