share_log

Retail Investors Who Own 53% Along With Institutions Invested in Ouster, Inc. (NYSE:OUST) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

Retail Investors Who Own 53% Along With Institutions Invested in Ouster, Inc. (NYSE:OUST) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

零售投資者和機構共同持有Ouster, Inc.(紐交所:OUST)的53%股份,在上週看到他們的持股價值增加
Simply Wall St ·  11/14 01:54

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Ouster indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 37% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • Ouster大量的零售投資者持有股份,表明他們在管理和業務策略上集體擁有更大的發言權。
  • 前25個股東持有該業務的37%。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

A look at the shareholders of Ouster, Inc. (NYSE:OUST) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 53% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看Ouster, Inc. (紐交所: OUST)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說,大約53%,是零售投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體將最有利可圖(或者在市場下跌時損失最嚴重)。

While retail investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$126m market cap gain, institutions too had a 39% share in those profits.

儘管散戶投資者是上週12600萬美元市值增長中受益最多的群體,但機構也在這些利潤中佔有39%的份額。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ouster.

在下面的圖表中,我們關注Ouster的不同持股群體。

big
NYSE:OUST Ownership Breakdown November 13th 2024
紐交所:OUSt 所有權結構 2024年11月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ouster?

機構持股告訴我們關於Ouster的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Ouster already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ouster, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Ouster已經在其股份登記中有機構持股。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證是值得警惕的。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出股票,股票價格出現大幅下跌並不少見。因此,查看Ouster過去的盈利軌跡是有必要的(見下文)。當然,值得記住的是,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:OUST Earnings and Revenue Growth November 13th 2024
紐交所:OUSt 2024年11月的盈利與營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ouster. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 6.4% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.6% and 3.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Charles Pacala directly holds 1.5% of the total shares outstanding.

我們注意到對Ouster的對沖基金投資並不顯著。 我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大股東,持有6.4%的流通股。 同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有5.6%和3.3%的流通股。 此外,公司CEO查爾斯·帕卡拉直接持有1.5%的流通股。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Ouster

Ouster的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Ouster, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$27m worth of the US$525m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士在Ouster, Inc.中持有股票。內部人士作爲個體,總共持有價值2700萬美元的股份,而該公司的市值爲52500萬美元。這至少顯示出一些一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 53% of Ouster. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有Ouster 53%的股份。這種所有權使公衆投資者在關鍵政策決策上擁有一定的影響力,比如董事會成員組成、執行薪酬和股息支付比例。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Ouster you should be aware of.

我發現了解一家公司到底由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 舉個例子:我們發現了關於Ouster的3個警告信號,你應該注意這些。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論