share_log

Vir Biotechnology, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:VIR) Latest 4.0% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

Vir Biotechnology, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:VIR) Latest 4.0% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

Vir Biotechnology, Inc.(納斯達克:VIR)最新的4.0%下跌增加了一年來的損失,機構投資者可能會考慮採取 drastic 措施。
Simply Wall St ·  11/13 21:03

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Vir Biotechnology's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構持有股份較高意味着 vir biotechnology 的股價容易受到他們交易行爲的影響
  • 有6位投資者持有該公司的大部分股權,佔有53%的所有權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ:VIR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制着 Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (NASDAQ: VIR) 的情況,重要的是理解公司的所有權結構。擁有最大股份的是機構,佔據52%的所有權。換句話說,該組織從對公司的投資中獲得最大利潤(或最大損失)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$54m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 6.2% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Vir Biotechnology which might hurt individual investors.

作爲結果,機構投資者在上週市值下降了5400萬美元后遭受了最大的損失。最近的損失增加了股東一年6.2%的損失,這可能會讓這群投資者感到不滿。通常被稱爲"市場操縱者",機構在影響任何股票價格動態方面擁有重要的影響力。因此,如果下跌持續下去,機構投資者可能會面臨被迫賣出Vir Biotechnology的壓力,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Vir Biotechnology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地了解Vir Biotechnology的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:VIR Ownership Breakdown November 13th 2024
NasdaqGS:VIR 2024年11月13日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vir Biotechnology?

機構投資者擁有Vir Biotechnology相當多的股權。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的可信度,但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出不良的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有一個股票時,總會存在一種『擁擠的交易』風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方派可能會競相快速拋售股票。此風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以看到Vir Biotechnology的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住故事的背後總存在更多的細節。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Vir Biotechnology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Vir Biotechnology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Vir Biotechnology確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當比例的股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們喜歡。但像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在"擁擠交易"的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到Vir Biotechnology的歷史盈利和營業收入,但要記住,故事總是更多。

big
NasdaqGS:VIR Earnings and Revenue Growth November 13th 2024
納斯達克GS:Vir生物科技2024年11月13日的盈利和營收增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Vir Biotechnology. The company's largest shareholder is SB Investment Advisers (UK) Limited, with ownership of 12%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 9.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。我們注意到對於Vir生物科技,對沖基金並未有實質性的投資。該公司最大的股東是Sb投資顧問(英國)有限公司,持有12%的股權。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股中的12%和9.4%。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Vir Biotechnology

私人股權投資公司持有Vir Biotechnology的22%股份。這意味着他們在重要的政策決策中可能是有影響力的。一些投資者可能會因此受到鼓舞,因爲私人股權有時能夠鼓勵市場看到公司的價值。另外,這些股東可能在上市後退出投資。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Vir Biotechnology, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$69m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股東可能會對這樣一種情況感興趣,即公司內部人士在 Vir Biotechnology, Inc. 擁有股份。這是一個相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在意義上的一致性通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們大約擁有價值約6900萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人士的一致性問題,可以單擊此處查看內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此他們不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種擁有量可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 21%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

擁有21%股權,股權投資公司有能力在塑造企業價值創造爲重點的戰略中發揮作用。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲股權投資有時是讓管理層負責的激進分子。但另一些時候,股權投資正在拋售,將公司上市。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 6.2% of Vir Biotechnology stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

目前,公共公司擁有Vir Biotechnology股票的6.2%。 這可能是戰略利益,而且這兩家公司可能有相關的業務興趣。有可能它們已拆分。 這種持有可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Vir Biotechnology better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Vir Biotechnology that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮到擁有一家公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解Vir Biotechnology,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了2個警告信號,您在投資這裏之前應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論