NIP Group Inc. (NASDAQ:NIPG) CEO Ho Kwan Yau's Holdings Dropped 13% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback
NIP Group Inc. (NASDAQ:NIPG) CEO Ho Kwan Yau's Holdings Dropped 13% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over NIP Group implies vested interests in company growth
- 56% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- NIP集團內部人員對公司增長有着既得利益的重要控制權
- 前5大股東持有企業的56%
- 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。
A look at the shareholders of NIP Group Inc. (NASDAQ:NIPG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 47% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看NIP集團股份有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:NIPG)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權勢。個人內部人員持有公司最大股份,佔比47%。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by US$53m.
結果,市值下降達到5300萬美元后,內部人士作爲一個群體遭受了最高的損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of NIP Group.
在下面的圖表中,我們重點關注NIP集團的不同所有權群。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NIP Group?
關於NIP集團缺乏機構持股,這對我們能告訴我們什麼?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
通常,不活躍的小公司缺少機構投資者,但大公司缺少機構投資者則不太常見。
There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. NIP Group's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
公司在股權註冊中沒有任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每日交易的股票數量)較低,機構可能難以購買大量股票。如果公司沒有需要籌集資本,機構可能缺乏建立頭寸的機會。還有可能是基金經理不持有該股票,因爲他們並不確信它會表現良好。NIP集團的盈利和營業收入歷史記錄(如下)可能對機構投資者並不具有吸引力,或者他們可能只是沒有仔細研究過該業務。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in NIP Group. With a 14% stake, CEO Ho Kwan Yau is the largest shareholder. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 12% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在NIP集團的持股不多。持有14%股份的CEO何坤堯是最大的股東。第二大股東持有約12%的流通股,第三大股東持有12%的所有權。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。
Insider Ownership Of NIP Group
NIP集團內部股權所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in NIP Group Inc.. Insiders own US$164m worth of shares in the US$350m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在 NIP 集團有着重要的持股。內部人士在這家市值 35000萬美元的公司中擁有價值 16400萬美元的股份。我們會說這顯示了與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是業務創始人。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over NIP Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆擁有 41% 的所有權,其中大部分是個人投資者,對 NIP 集團有一定程度的影響力。雖然這種所有權比例可能還不能足以影響政策決定偏向他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 12%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司12%的股份。私營公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人員通過在私營公司中持有股份而不是以個人身份持有公共公司的股份來擁有對公共公司的利益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。