share_log

John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:JMSB) Surges 22%; Individual Investors Who Own 46% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:JMSB) Surges 22%; Individual Investors Who Own 46% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

約翰·馬歇爾銀行公司(NASDAQ:JMSB)暴漲22%; 擁有46%股份的個人投資者和機構一起獲利
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/12 21:03

Key Insights

主要見解

  • John Marshall Bancorp's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in John Marshall Bancorp is 12%
  • 約翰·馬歇爾銀行的重要個人投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
  • 公司前25位股東持有50%的業務。
  • John Marshall Bancorp的內部所有權爲12%

A look at the shareholders of John Marshall Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:JMSB) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 46% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看約翰·馬歇爾銀行公司(納斯達克:JMSB)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最有影響力。在公司中持有最大股份的集團,準確地說大約46%,是個人投資者。換句話說,該集團面對最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$66m market cap gain, institutions too had a 41% share in those profits.

個別投資者是上週6600萬美元市值增長中受益最大的群體,機構也在這些利潤中擁有41%的份額。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of John Marshall Bancorp.

在下面的圖表中,我們將聚焦約翰·馬歇爾銀行的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqCM:JMSB Ownership Breakdown November 12th 2024
NasdaqCM:JMSb 所有權拆分2024年11月12日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About John Marshall Bancorp?

機構持股告訴我們關於約翰·馬歇爾銀行的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in John Marshall Bancorp. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at John Marshall Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所見,機構投資者在約翰·馬歇爾銀行擁有相當大的股份。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。 如果多家機構同時改變他們對一支股票的觀點,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看約翰·馬歇爾銀行以下的收益歷史記錄。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqCM:JMSB Earnings and Revenue Growth November 12th 2024
納斯達克CM:JMSb 2024年11月12日的盈利和營業收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in John Marshall Bancorp. Our data shows that T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 6.0% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

對於約翰·馬歇爾銀行,對沖基金持有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,T. Rowe Price Group,Inc.是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股份。BlackRock,Inc.和The Vanguard Group,Inc.分別持有6.0%和4.4%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。

Insider Ownership Of John Marshall Bancorp

約翰·馬歇爾銀行的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of John Marshall Bancorp, Inc.. Insiders have a US$40m stake in this US$349m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

內部持有John Marshall Bancorp, Inc.相當比例的股份。內部持有該公司34900萬美元業務中4000萬美元的股份。我們會說這顯示了與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是公司規模仍然相當小,一些內部可能是公司的創始人。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 46% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over John Marshall Bancorp. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有46%股份的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對John Marshall Bancorp具有一定影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand John Marshall Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that John Marshall Bancorp is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

考慮持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解約翰·馬歇爾銀行,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,約翰·馬歇爾銀行在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警示信號,您應該知道...

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論