Institutions Profited After Ferguson Enterprises Inc.'s (NYSE:FERG) Market Cap Rose US$2.1b Last Week but Individual Investors Profited the Most
Institutions Profited After Ferguson Enterprises Inc.'s (NYSE:FERG) Market Cap Rose US$2.1b Last Week but Individual Investors Profited the Most
Key Insights
主要見解
- Ferguson Enterprises' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 25 shareholders own 31% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- Ferguson Enterprises的重要個人投資者所有權表明,關鍵決定受到來自更大公衆股東的影響
- 前25名股東擁有公司31%的股份
- 最近由內部人士出售。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ferguson Enterprises Inc. (NYSE:FERG), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 59% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解Ferguson Enterprises Inc.(紐交所:FERG)真正控制權的感知,了解企業的所有權結構至關重要。個人投資者持有公司59%的股份,換句話說,該團體將從他們投資公司獲得最大利潤(或最大損失)。
Following a 5.3% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but institutions who own 41% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
上週股價上漲5.3%,個人投資者獲利最多,但擁有41%股份的機構也有望從中獲益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ferguson Enterprises, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解每種類型的Ferguson Enterprises所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ferguson Enterprises?
機構所有權告訴我們有關Ferguson Enterprises的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Ferguson Enterprises already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ferguson Enterprises, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Ferguson Enterprises已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,在依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證時最好保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售股票,則看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查Ferguson Enterprises的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Ferguson Enterprises is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.2% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.5% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 2.6% of the company stock.
Ferguson Enterprises不是對沖基金所有。目前,Vanguard Group, Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有9.2%的股份。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股東,持有6.5%的普通股,而FMR LLC持有公司大約2.6%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Ferguson Enterprises
對於Ferguson Enterprises的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Ferguson Enterprises Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$47m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,公司內部人員以自己的名義擁有菲格森企業Inc不到1%的股份。 由於這是一家大公司,我們只希望內部人員擁有其中的一小部分。 但值得注意的是,他們持有價值4700萬美元的股份。 可以說,最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。 您可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 59% of Ferguson Enterprises. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通公衆,包括零售投資者,在菲格森企業擁有59%的股份。 這種所有權規模使得來自普通公衆的投資者擁有一定的集體力量。 他們可以並且可能影響公司在執行薪酬、股利政策和擬議的業務收購方面的決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ferguson Enterprises better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Ferguson Enterprises has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解弗格森企業,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,承擔風險 - 我們認爲弗格森企業有3個警告信號,您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。