Institutional Investors Are L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:LHX) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$3.3b Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:LHX) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$3.3b Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in L3Harris Technologies implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構在l3harris technologies的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響
- 共有12家投資者擁有51%的控股權。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
A look at the shareholders of L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:LHX) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下l3harris technologies,Inc.(紐交所:LHX)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有實力。機構持有該公司的86%股份,擁有公司中的最大股份。換句話說,這個群體最有可能從他們對該公司的投資中獲益(或損失最大)。
Last week's 6.9% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 47% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週的漲幅達到6.9%,這意味着機構投資者處於積極的一端,儘管公司展現出了強勁的長期趨勢。股東的年度回報率目前爲47%,上週的漲幅就像錦上添花。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of L3Harris Technologies.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了l3harris technologies的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About L3Harris Technologies?
機構持股比例告訴我們關於L3Harris Technologies的一些信息。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
L3Harris Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of L3Harris Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
l3harris technologies已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者之間有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅依靠這一事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查l3harris technologies的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in L3Harris Technologies. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.2% and 6.8% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不注意他們的偏好。對於l3harris technologies,對沖基金並不擁有太多股份。目前,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約9.2%和6.8%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
看一下股東註冊表,我們可以看到前12大股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東掌握多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of L3Harris Technologies
L3Harris Technologies的內部股東權益。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of L3Harris Technologies, Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$240m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士在其自己名下擁有l3harris technologies公司不到1%的所有權。 這是一家非常大的公司,因此如果內部人員擁有公司的大部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共擁有價值24000萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是在買入還是在賣出可能更有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over L3Harris Technologies. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有13%股權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對l3harris technologies有一定程度的影響力。 儘管這種所有權相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東意見不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for L3Harris Technologies (of which 1 is a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.
我發現看看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲取見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了L3Harris Technologies的3個警示信號(其中1個有點不太愉快!)你應該知道。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。