First Internet Bancorp's (NASDAQ:INBK) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 27% Over Last Week
First Internet Bancorp's (NASDAQ:INBK) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 27% Over Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies First Internet Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構擁有的股份比例高意味着第一互聯銀行股價對他們的交易行爲敏感
- 前16名股東持有該業務50%的股份。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of First Internet Bancorp (NASDAQ:INBK) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 74% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下第一互聯銀行(納斯達克:INBK)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有該公司股份數量最多的群體,確切地說約爲74%,是機構。換句話說,該群體從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或丟失最多)
Last week's 27% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 164% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週上漲了27%,這意味着機構投資者處於積極的一端,即使公司展現出了強勁的長期趨勢。投資回報率爲一年漲幅目前爲164%,上週的收益應該是受人歡迎的。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of First Internet Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究First Internet Bancorp的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Internet Bancorp?
機構持股告訴我們有關First Internet Bancorp的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in First Internet Bancorp. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see First Internet Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在First Internet Bancorp中擁有相當大比例的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總有風險是他們處於'擁擠交易'中。當這種交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以看到First Internet Bancorp的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加豐富的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in First Internet Bancorp. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 8.9% of shares outstanding. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is the second largest shareholder owning 5.8% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 4.9% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO David Becker directly holds 4.6% of the total shares outstanding.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對First Internet Bancorp而言,對沖基金未持有太多股份。通過我們的數據,可以看到最大的股東是BlackRock, Inc.,持有8.9%的流通股。Dimensional Fund Advisors LP是第二大股東,擁有5.8%的普通股,而The Vanguard Group, Inc.持有大約4.9%的公司股票。此外,該公司的首席執行官David Becker直接持有總流通股份的4.6%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
通過股東登記簿我們可以看到,16個最大的股東控制着50%的所有權,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of First Internet Bancorp
First Internet Bancorp的內部持股權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in First Internet Bancorp. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$25m worth of the US$343m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有First Internet Bancorp的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有價值2500萬美元的34300萬美元公司。看到內部人士有一定的投資是件好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人士是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over First Internet Bancorp. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
佔有18%股份,主要由個人投資者組成的普通大衆在First Internet Bancorp擁有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。