FreightCar America, Inc. (NASDAQ:RAIL) Surges 27%; Individual Investors Who Own 45% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
FreightCar America, Inc. (NASDAQ:RAIL) Surges 27%; Individual Investors Who Own 45% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in FreightCar America indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 20 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 個人投資者在FreightCar America中佔據相當大的股權,這表明他們集體在管理和業務策略上具有更大的發言權
- 總共有20位股東持有該公司的50%股權
- 最近由內部人士出售。
If you want to know who really controls FreightCar America, Inc. (NASDAQ:RAIL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解誰真正控制FreightCar America, Inc. (NASDAQ:RAIL),那麼您需要看其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到個人投資者在公司中擁有45%的所有權。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或承擔最大風險)。
Following a 27% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but institutions who own 29% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
上週股價上漲27%,個人投資者獲利最多,但擁有29%股份的機構也有望從增長中獲益。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of FreightCar America.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注FreightCar America的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FreightCar America?
機構持股比例對FreightCar America有何影響?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in FreightCar America. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of FreightCar America, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在FreightCar America中持有大量股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經審視了這支股票,並且喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售一支股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查FreightCar America的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
FreightCar America is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Fabricaciones y Servicios de México, S.A. de C.V. with 10% of shares outstanding. With 8.4% and 8.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Continental General Insurance Company, Asset Management Arm and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Nicholas Randall, the CEO has 0.8% of the shares allocated to their name.
FreightCar America不是由對沖基金持有。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是墨西哥Fabricaciones y Servicios de S.A. de C.V,持有10%的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是大陸綜合保險公司、資產管理部門和太平洋投資管理公司LLC,他們分別持有8.4%和8.2%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Nicholas Randall名下擁有0.8%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 20 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們所有權數據的進一步觀察表明,前20大股東持有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。
Insider Ownership Of FreightCar America
FreightCar America內部人士持股情況。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in FreightCar America, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$287m, and insiders have US$40m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我們的資料顯示,內部人士在 freightcar america,Inc. 中持有相當數量的股份。其市值僅爲 28700萬美元,內部人員名下擁有價值 4000萬美元的股份。這可能意味着創始人仍然擁有大量股份。您可以點擊此處查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 45% stake in FreightCar America. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般大衆,通常是個人投資者,在 freightcar america 擁有 45% 的股份。儘管這一所有權規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不協調,可能不足以改變公司方針。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 12%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司12%的股份。 僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下那些私營公司的所有者是誰。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有對一家公共公司股票的興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for FreightCar America that you should be aware of.
我發現查看一個公司的確切所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了freightcar america的3個警告信號,您應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。