Does Moog (NYSE:MOG.A) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Moog (NYSE:MOG.A) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Moog Inc. (NYSE:MOG.A) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
霍華德·馬克斯很好地表達了這一觀點,他說,與其擔心股價波動,不如擔心永久損失的可能性...我認識的每個實際投資者都會擔心這一點。因此,顯而易見的是,當您考慮任何給定股票的風險時,您需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖累公司。重要的是,Moog股票(紐交所:MOG.A)確實存在債務。但真正的問題是這些債務是否讓公司變得更加危險。
When Is Debt A Problem?
什麼時候負債才是一個問題?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務是幫助企業發展的工具,但如果企業無力償還債權人,那麼它就受制於債權人。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以控制企業。然而,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,一家公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,永久性地稀釋股東,以維持其資產負債表。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們審查債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平的組合。
How Much Debt Does Moog Carry?
Moog負載有多少債務?
As you can see below, Moog had US$874.1m of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$61.7m in cash, and so its net debt is US$812.4m.
正如您所看到的,截至2024年9月,Moog公司的債務爲87410萬美元,與前一年相當。您可以單擊圖表以獲取更詳細信息。然而,它還有6170萬美元的現金,因此淨債務爲81240萬美元。
How Strong Is Moog's Balance Sheet?
Muog的資產負債表有多堅實?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Moog had liabilities of US$1.03b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.23b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$61.7m as well as receivables valued at US$1.16b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.04b.
從最近的資產負債表可以看出,Moog的短期負債爲10.3億美元,超過1年到期的負債爲12.3億美元。 抵消這些債務的是,其現金爲6170萬美元,以及價值11.6億美元的應收賬款,其中12個月內到期。 因此,其負債超過現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和達10.4億美元。
Of course, Moog has a market capitalization of US$7.10b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
當然,Moog的市值爲71億美元,因此這些負債可能是可以管理的。 但是存在足夠的負債,我們肯定建議股東繼續關注公司的資產負債表情況。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
爲了衡量公司相對於其收益的債務情況,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)和其利息支出除以利息前收益(EBIT)的比例(其利息覆蓋率)。這種方法的優點是,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨負債與 EBITDA),又考慮到了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。
Moog's net debt is sitting at a very reasonable 1.7 times its EBITDA, while its EBIT covered its interest expense just 6.3 times last year. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. Also positive, Moog grew its EBIT by 25% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Moog can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
Moog的淨債務相當合理,是其EBITDA的1.7倍,而其EBIT只能支付去年利息費用的6.3倍。 儘管這些數字沒有引起我們的警覺,但值得注意的是公司債務成本確實產生了真正的影響。此外,Moog去年的EBIT增長了25%,這應該會更容易償還債務。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。 但最終企業未來的盈利能力將決定Moog是否能隨着時間加強其資產負債表。 所以如果您關注未來,可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師的利潤預測。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. In the last three years, Moog created free cash flow amounting to 12% of its EBIT, an uninspiring performance. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.
但是我們的最後考慮也很重要,因爲公司不能用紙面利潤償還債務;公司需要實際現金。 因此,邏輯的下一步是看看EBIT實際匹配的自由現金額的比例。 在過去三年中,Moog創造的自由現金流相當於其EBIT的12%,表現慘淡。 這種低迷的現金轉化水平削弱了其管理和償還債務的能力。
Our View
我們的觀點
When it comes to the balance sheet, the standout positive for Moog was the fact that it seems able to grow its EBIT confidently. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For example, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow makes us a little nervous about its debt. Considering this range of data points, we think Moog is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Moog that you should be aware of before investing here.
當涉及資產負債表時,尤其令人印象深刻的正面因素是Moog似乎能夠自信地增長其EBIt。然而,我們的其他觀察並不那麼令人振奮。例如,其將EBIt轉換爲自由現金流的能力讓我們對其債務有些擔憂。考慮到這一系列數據點,我們認爲Moog有能力管理其債務水平。但需要謹慎的是:我們認爲債務水平足夠高,需要持續監控。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是一個明顯的起點。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。例如,我們發現了Moog的1個警示信號,您在進行投資前應該意識到這一點。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
當一切塵埃落定時,有時更容易專注於那些甚至不需要債務的公司。讀者可以立即免費查看零淨債務的成長股列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。