share_log

Is FedEx (NYSE:FDX) A Risky Investment?

Is FedEx (NYSE:FDX) A Risky Investment?

聯邦快遞(紐交所: FDX)是一項風險投資嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  11/11 18:48

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that FedEx Corporation (NYSE:FDX) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

當戴維·伊本說:「波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本永久損失。」時,他說得很對。當你評估一個公司的風險時,考慮到資產負債表是很自然的,因爲一個企業倒閉時通常涉及債務。我們注意到聯邦快遞公司(紐交所: FDX)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但真正的問題是,這筆債務是否讓公司變得有風險。

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助企業,直到企業因缺乏新資本或自由現金流而無法償還債務。如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能什麼也得不到。然而,更頻繁的(但仍然代價高昂)情況是,一家公司必須以非常低的價格發行股票,永久性地稀釋股東,以維持其資產負債表。通過取代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業的極好工具。考慮公司的債務水平的第一步是將其現金和債務考慮在一起。

How Much Debt Does FedEx Carry?

聯邦快遞承擔了多少債務?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that FedEx had US$19.9b in debt in August 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$5.94b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$13.9b.

下面的圖表顯示,聯邦快遞在2024年8月有199億美元的債務;與前年大致相同。然而,它有59.4億美元的現金抵消這一筆債務,導致淨債務約爲139億美元。

big
NYSE:FDX Debt to Equity History November 11th 2024
紐交所: FDX 債務股權歷史 2024年11月11日

How Strong Is FedEx's Balance Sheet?

聯邦快遞的資產負債表有多強?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that FedEx had liabilities of US$14.1b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$45.4b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$5.94b in cash and US$10.3b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$43.3b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data,我們可以看到聯邦快遞有141億美元的負債在12個月內到期,而超過這個時間的負債達到454億美元。與此相抵,它有59.4億美元的現金和103億美元應於12個月內到期的應收款項。因此,從負債總額433億美元超過其現金和近期應收款項的情況來看。

This deficit is considerable relative to its very significant market capitalization of US$69.9b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on FedEx's use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

相對於其非常顯著的699億美元市值,這個逆差相當可觀,因此建議股東應該密切關注聯邦快遞的債務使用。如果其貸款人要求其加強資產負債表,股東很可能面臨嚴重的股份稀釋。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

FedEx has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.3. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 17.9 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. On the other hand, FedEx saw its EBIT drop by 2.0% in the last twelve months. That sort of decline, if sustained, will obviously make debt harder to handle. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if FedEx can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

聯邦快遞的淨債務與EBITDA比率僅爲1.3。它的EBIT輕鬆覆蓋了利息開支,爲利息開支的17.9倍。因此,我們對其非常保守的債務使用感到放心。另一方面,聯邦快遞在過去十二個月中看到其EBIT下降了2.0%。這種下降,如果持續下去,顯然會使債務更難處理。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要重點關注的領域。但最終,企業未來的盈利能力將決定聯邦快遞能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的想法,您可能會發現對分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, FedEx's free cash flow amounted to 46% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

最後,一家公司只能用冷硬現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。因此,值得查看其EBIT有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去三年中,聯邦快遞的自由現金流佔其EBIT的46%,低於我們的預期。這種弱勢的現金轉換使其更難處理債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

On our analysis FedEx's interest cover should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For example, its level of total liabilities makes us a little nervous about its debt. Looking at all this data makes us feel a little cautious about FedEx's debt levels. While we appreciate debt can enhance returns on equity, we'd suggest that shareholders keep close watch on its debt levels, lest they increase. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with FedEx .

根據我們的分析,聯邦快遞的利息保障應該表明它不會在債務方面遇到太多麻煩。然而,我們的其他觀察並不那麼令人振奮。例如,其總負債水平讓我們對其債務感到有些緊張。審視所有這些數據讓我們對聯邦快遞的債務水平感到有些謹慎。雖然我們欣賞債務可以提升股東權益回報,我們建議股東們密切關注其債務水平,以免增加。清晰地,資產負債表是在分析債務時應重點關注的領域。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。因此,您應該意識到我們在聯邦快遞身上發現的1個警示信號。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論