Service Corporation International's (NYSE:SCI) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.5% Over the Past Week
Service Corporation International's (NYSE:SCI) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.5% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Service Corporation International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構在國際服務公司的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
- 共有13名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
- 業內人士最近賣出了
A look at the shareholders of Service Corporation International (NYSE:SCI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看國際服務公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:SCI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲82%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$769m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 53% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
在上週該公司的市值上漲了7.69億美元之後,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。目前,一年股東回報率爲53%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Service Corporation International.
在下圖中,我們放大了國際服務公司的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Service Corporation International?
關於國際服務公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Service Corporation International. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Service Corporation International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如你所見,機構投資者持有國際服務公司的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到國際服務公司的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It looks like hedge funds own 5.0% of Service Corporation International shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Thomas Ryan directly holds 0.8% of the total shares outstanding.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。看來對沖基金擁有國際服務公司5.0%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的10%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約8.9%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有8.7%的所有權。此外,該公司首席執行官托馬斯·瑞安直接持有已發行股份總額的0.8%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前13名股東擁有該公司51%的總所有權,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Service Corporation International
國際服務公司的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Service Corporation International. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$299m. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有國際服務公司的部分股份。內部人士持有價值2.99億美元的大量股份。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益非常一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Service Corporation International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有國際服務公司10%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Service Corporation International that you should be aware of before investing here.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了國際服務公司的兩個警告信號,在投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。