share_log

Positive Week for Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:LYEL) Institutional Investors Who Lost 26% Over the Past Year

Positive Week for Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:LYEL) Institutional Investors Who Lost 26% Over the Past Year

Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.(納斯達克:LYEL)的機構投資者在過去一年中損失了26%,這是一個積極的週末。
Simply Wall St ·  11/10 21:09

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lyell Immunopharma's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構擁有的持股比例高意味着萊爾免疫藥業的股價對它們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 前六大股東持有該業務的50%股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

A look at the shareholders of Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:LYEL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 45% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (納斯達克: LYEL) 的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。擁有45%股份,機構在該公司擁有最多的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 8.9% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 26%.

機構投資者會對上週股價上漲8.9%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的損失總共達到了令人失望的26%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lyell Immunopharma.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大查看了Lyell Immunopharma的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:LYEL Ownership Breakdown November 10th 2024
納斯達克LYEL所有權分佈2024年11月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lyell Immunopharma?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Lyell免疫藥物的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lyell Immunopharma. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lyell Immunopharma's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Lyell Immunopharma擁有相當大比例的股份。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過於依賴於機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。 他們也有時會犯錯。 當多家機構擁有某股時,總存在它們在一個'擁擠交易'中的風險。 當這樣一筆交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。 在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。 您可以在下面看到Lyell Immunopharma的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事背後總是有更多內容。

big
NasdaqGS:LYEL Earnings and Revenue Growth November 10th 2024
納斯達克GS:LYEL盈利和營業收入增長2024年11月10日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lyell Immunopharma. Our data shows that Arch Venture Partners, L.P. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

對Lyell Immunopharma,對沖基金持有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,Arch Venture Partners, L.P.是最大的股東,持有14%的流通股。第二大股東持有約12%的流通股,第三大股東持有7.9%的股份所有權。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Lyell Immunopharma

Lyell免疫藥物的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$11m worth of stock in the US$341m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東可能會有興趣了解內部人士在Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.持有股份。內部人士以自己的名義持有該公司價值1100萬美元的股票,在這家價值34100萬美元的公司中佔股。這至少顯示了一定程度的一致性。您可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 18% stake in Lyell Immunopharma. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股權投資公司持有Lyell Immunopharma 18%的股份。 這意味着它們可以在關鍵政策決策上產生影響。 一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵市場看到公司的價值。 或者,這些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 11% of Lyell Immunopharma. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

我們發現公開公司擁有Lyell Immunopharma 11%的股份。 我們無法確定,但這很可能是戰略性股份。 這些公司可能類似,或者合作。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lyell Immunopharma better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 5 warning signs we've spotted with Lyell Immunopharma (including 3 which are potentially serious) .

始終要考慮持有公司股份的不同群體。 但要更好地了解Lyell Immunopharma,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 爲此,您應該了解我們已經發現的Lyell Immunopharma的5個警告信號(其中3個可能很嚴重)。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論