Institutional Investors Are Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.'s (NYSE:AHH) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$50m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.'s (NYSE:AHH) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$50m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Armada Hoffler Properties' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 機構擁有的持股比例顯著高,意味着Armada Hoffler Properties的股價會受到他們交易行爲的影響
- 前13名股東佔該公司50%的股份。
- 最近有內部人員購買。
A look at the shareholders of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (NYSE:AHH) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 74% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一下Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (NYSE:AHH)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有力量。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有74%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.1b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 17% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週,機構投資者在公司市值達到11億美元后受益最大。股東的一年回報率目前爲17%,而上週的收益更是錦上添花。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Armada Hoffler Properties.
讓我們更仔細地看一下,不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Armada Hoffler Properties的什麼事情。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Armada Hoffler Properties?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Armada Hoffler Properties的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Armada Hoffler Properties already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Armada Hoffler Properties' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Armada Hoffler Properties的股東名單中已經有機構。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴於這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會做的一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此值得查看Armada Hoffler Properties的以下收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Armada Hoffler Properties. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.6% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Louis Haddad, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.
由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股票的一半,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。我們注意到對Armada Hoffler Properties投資不大意味着對沖基金。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock, Inc.是最大的股東,持有16%的股份。爲了襯托,第二大股東持有約9.6%的待售股份,第三大股東擁有4.6%的股份。此外,我們發現CEO Louis Haddad名下有0.7%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
在我們的所有權數字中仔細看看,前13名股東擁有的股權合計爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。
Insider Ownership Of Armada Hoffler Properties
Armada Hoffler Properties的內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$23m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以看到內部持有者在Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.擁有股份。 這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的有意義的一致性通常是積極的。 在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2300萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 大多數人會說這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。 但還是值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在出售股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in Armada Hoffler Properties. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在Armada Hoffler Properties持有24%的股份。 儘管這種所有權比例可能不足以影響他們有利的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Armada Hoffler Properties better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Armada Hoffler Properties (including 1 which can't be ignored) .
始終值得考慮在一家公司中擁有股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解Armada Hoffler Properties,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的Armada Hoffler Properties的3個警示信號(其中一個不容忽視)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。