Institutional Investors Are Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s (NYSE:TPB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$63m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Turning Point Brands, Inc.'s (NYSE:TPB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$63m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Turning Point Brands' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構擁有的股份比例極高,這意味着 turning point brands 的股價對它們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 前11名股東持有公司50%的股份。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
A look at the shareholders of Turning Point Brands, Inc. (NYSE:TPB) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下 turning point brands 公司(紐交所:TPB)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。我們可以看到,機構持有公司81%的股權。換句話說,這個群體有可能從投資公司中獲得最多利益(或者蒙受最大損失)。
Last week's 7.4% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 144% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週的7.4%增長意味着機構投資者處在積極的一端,即使公司展現出強勁的長期趨勢。 股東的一年回報率目前爲144%,上週的增長更是錦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Turning Point Brands, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Turning Point Brands的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Turning Point Brands?
機構持股告訴我們關於Turning Point Brands的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Turning Point Brands does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Turning Point Brands, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Turning Point Brands確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有該公司的大部分股票。 這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。 但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。 如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,可能會看到股價大幅下跌。 因此,值得檢查Turning Point Brands的過去收益軌跡(以下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Turning Point Brands is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.8% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.6% and 6.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Graham Purdy directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能會需要關注他們的偏好。Turning Point Brands不是由對沖基金所持有。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有8.8%的已發行股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.6%和6.9%。此外,公司的CEO Graham Purdy直接持有總已發行股份的0.9%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記冊,我們發現其中 50% 的所有權受前11位股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東掌握所有權益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Turning Point Brands
Turning Point Brands的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Turning Point Brands, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$879m, and insiders have US$39m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人員在Turning Point Brands, Inc.持有部分股份。其市值僅爲87900萬美元,內部人員名下的股票價值3900萬美元。有些人可能會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間利益的一致性。但值得檢查的是,這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Turning Point Brands. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
持有12%的個人投資者組成的普通大衆對Turning Point Brands具有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不能說了算,但肯定會對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Turning Point Brands , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。考慮到投資風險這一永恒的威脅。我們已經發現了與turning point brands相關的兩個警示信號,了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。