Institutional Investors Are Community Financial System, Inc.'s (NYSE:CBU) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$416m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Community Financial System, Inc.'s (NYSE:CBU) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$416m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Community Financial System implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 機構在Community Financial System的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響
- 前8大股東擁有公司50%的股份。
- 內部人員最近一直在買入。
If you want to know who really controls Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE:CBU), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 72% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着Community Financial System, Inc. (紐交所: CBU),那麼你需要看看它的股權登記情況。持有最大股份的是擁有72%所有權的機構群體。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$416m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 74% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週該公司的市值增加了4,1600萬美元,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。投資回報率爲1年74%,上週的增長是受歡迎的。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Community Financial System, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解Community Financial System的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Community Financial System?
機構持有的股份告訴我們有關Community Financial System的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Community Financial System does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Community Financial System, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到Community Financial System確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的一大部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此值得檢查Community Financial System的過去收入軌跡(下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Community Financial System is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 14%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 6.9% of the stock.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會決策。Community Financial System並不屬於對沖基金。該公司最大的股東是BlackRock,持有14%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約12%和6.9%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們對Brookfield Infrastructure有了更深入的了解,發現前8位股東佔持股比例的約50%,這意味着除了大股東外還有少數小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Community Financial System
社區金融系統的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in Community Financial System, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$44m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到,內部人員擁有Community Financial System, Inc.的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能具有意義的一致性通常是一個積極的信號。在這種情況下,他們持有約4400萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人員的一致性問題,可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資人,擁有該公司27%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然該群體不能決定公司的政策,但它確實可以對公司的經營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。