Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After SpartanNash Company's (NASDAQ:SPTN) Latest 11% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After SpartanNash Company's (NASDAQ:SPTN) Latest 11% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, SpartanNash's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 考慮到機構在股票中所佔比例較大,spartannash的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響。
- 共有9個投資者持有該公司的51%所有權
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
Every investor in SpartanNash Company (NASDAQ:SPTN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
納斯達克上的SpartanNash公司(NASDAQ:SPTN)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東團體。持有最大股份的是擁有84%所有權的機構,換句話說,這個機構面臨着最大的上行潛力(或者下行風險)。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 11% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 9.9% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in SpartanNash's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
機構投資者上週看到其持有的價值下跌了11%。不用說,最近的損失進一步增加了股東一年的損失,達到了9.9%,這可能不會得到機構股東尤其是這類股東的好評。也被稱爲 "智慧資金",機構對股價的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果spartannash的股價繼續疲弱,機構投資者可能會感到有必要出售該股票,這對個人投資者來說可能不是理想的情況。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SpartanNash.
讓我們更近一步了解不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關spartannash的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SpartanNash?
機構持股情況告訴我們有關spartannash的什麼信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
SpartanNash already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of SpartanNash, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
spartannash的股東註冊表上已經有機構。事實上,他們在公司擁有一部分可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某一股票,那麼很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查spartannash過去的收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in SpartanNash. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.4% and 7.7% of the stock.
投資者應該注意,實際上有一半以上的股份是由機構持有的,因此它們可以集體施加重大影響力。對於SpartanNash,對沖基金並沒有太多股份。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股東,持有17%的流通股。相較之下,第二和第三大股東持有的股份約爲9.4%和7.7%。
We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了進一步的挖掘,並發現前9大股東持有該公司股份的51%左右,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of SpartanNash
spartannash的內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in SpartanNash Company. In their own names, insiders own US$11m worth of stock in the US$667m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們可以報告說,spartannash公司的內部人員擁有股份。在他們自己的名字下,內部人員在這家總市值爲66700萬美元的公司中擁有價值1100萬美元的股票。看到一些內部人員的投資是好事,但也值得看看這些內部人員是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶投資者在內的一般公衆持有該公司的15%股份,因此無法輕易忽視。儘管擁有這樣的所有權,但如果不與其他大股東保持同步,這種所有權規模可能還不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for SpartanNash (of which 1 is a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如風險。每家公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現了spartannash的3個警示信號(其中1個有點不太好!)你應該了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。