These 4 Measures Indicate That Qiagen (NYSE:QGEN) Is Using Debt Safely
These 4 Measures Indicate That Qiagen (NYSE:QGEN) Is Using Debt Safely
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Qiagen N.V. (NYSE:QGEN) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
David Iben 在他說'波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本的永久損失。'時表達得很好。因此,顯而易見,當您考慮股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們可以看到,Qiagen N.V.(紐交所:QGEN)在其業務中使用了債務。但真正的問題是,這種債務是否使公司變得更加冒險。
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
一般來說,當公司無法通過籌集資本或自身現金流輕鬆償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以接管公司。然而,更頻繁但仍然代價高昂的情況是,一家公司必須以低於市場價的價格發行股票,以永久性稀釋股東,以彌補其資產負債表。當然,許多公司使用債務來資助發展,而沒有任何負面影響。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用情況時,首先要考慮現金和債務。
What Is Qiagen's Debt?
Qiagen的債務是多少?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, Qiagen had US$1.92b of debt, up from US$1.53b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have US$1.48b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$439.5m.
正如您在下面所看到的,在2024年9月底,Qiagen的債務爲19.2億美元,比一年前的15.3億美元增加。點擊圖片查看更多詳情。然而,它擁有14.8億美元的現金來抵消此債務,導致淨債務約爲43950萬美元。
How Strong Is Qiagen's Balance Sheet?
QIAGEN的資產負債表有多強?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Qiagen had liabilities of US$1.13b due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.61b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$1.48b and US$345.6m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$914.3m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,QIAGEN的短期負債爲11.3億美元,之後到期的負債爲16.1億美元。另一方面,其現金爲14.8億美元,短期應收賬款爲34560萬美元。因此,其負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款合計高出91430萬美元。
Since publicly traded Qiagen shares are worth a total of US$9.81b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
由於公開交易的QIAGEN股票總值爲98.1億美元,看起來這種負債水平不太可能構成重大威脅。但存在足夠的負債,我們肯定建議股東繼續監視資產負債表的變化。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們使用兩個主要比率來了解債務相對於收入的水平。首先是淨債務除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其稅前利潤(EBIT)可以覆蓋利息支出的倍數(或簡稱爲利息覆蓋率)。 這種方法的優勢在於我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨債務與EBITDA)又考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(利息覆蓋比)。
Qiagen has a low debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.65. And remarkably, despite having net debt, it actually received more in interest over the last twelve months than it had to pay. So there's no doubt this company can take on debt while staying cool as a cucumber. The good news is that Qiagen has increased its EBIT by 8.5% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Qiagen can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
QIAGEN的債務與EBITDA比率僅爲0.65。非常值得注意的是,儘管有淨負債,但實際上過去十二個月它收到的利息比需要支付的利息還要多。毫無疑問,這家公司可以通過承擔債務保持冷靜。好消息是,QIAGEN過去十二個月的EBIT增長了8.5%,這應該會緩解債務償還方面的擔憂。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。但最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定QIAGEN是否可以隨着時間加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現對分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Qiagen generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 91% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.
但我們的最終考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司無法用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要硬通貨。因此,我們總是查看有多少EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,QIAGEN產生的自由現金流相當可觀,達到了其EBIT的91%,超出我們的預期。這使其在償還債務方面處於非常有利的位置。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, Qiagen's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Zooming out, Qiagen seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Qiagen you should know about.
令人高興的是,Qiagen令人印象深刻的利息覆蓋表明它在債務方面佔據上風。而好消息並未止步於此,因爲其將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的能力也支持這一印象!放大視野後,Qiagen似乎相當合理地使用債務;我們對此予以肯定。畢竟,明智的槓桿可以提升股本回報率。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。這些風險可能很難發現。每家公司都會面臨這些風險,我們已經發現了Qiagen的3個警示信號,您應該知曉。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天結束時,通常更好地關注那些沒有淨債務的公司。您可以查看我們特別名單上的這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。