While Institutions Invested in D-Wave Quantum Inc. (NYSE:QBTS) Benefited From Last Week's 38% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most
While Institutions Invested in D-Wave Quantum Inc. (NYSE:QBTS) Benefited From Last Week's 38% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most
Key Insights
主要見解
- D-Wave Quantum's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in D-Wave Quantum is 47%
- D-Wave Quantum的重要零售投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更廣大公衆股東的影響
- 前25大股東持有47%的業務。
- D-Wave Quantum的機構所有權爲47%
If you want to know who really controls D-Wave Quantum Inc. (NYSE:QBTS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 52% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着D-Wave Quantum Inc. (紐交所:QBTS),那麼您將不得不查看其股東名冊的構成。擁有52%股份,零售投資者擁有公司中最多的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者出現下跌)該群體將獲益最大(或損失最大)。
Following a 38% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but institutions who own 47% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
上週股價上漲38%,零售投資者獲利最大,但持有47%股份的機構也有望從漲幅中獲益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of D-Wave Quantum, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解D-Wave Quantum的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About D-Wave Quantum?
機構持股告訴我們關於D-Wave Quantum的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that D-Wave Quantum does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see D-Wave Quantum's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到D-Wave Quantum確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經觀察了這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但與其他人一樣,他們也可能錯誤。當多家機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們涉及的風險:可能存在一個'擁擠交易'。當這種交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到D-Wave Quantum的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in D-Wave Quantum. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Public Sector Pension Investment Board with 30% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.7% and 3.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到,對D-Wave Quantum並無實質性投資。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是公共部門養老金投資委員會,持有30%的股份。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的4.7%和3.1%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of D-Wave Quantum
D-Wave Quantum的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in D-Wave Quantum Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$3.4m worth of stock in the US$228m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
股東們可能會感興趣了解,內部人士擁有D-Wave Quantum Inc.的股份。內部人士以他們自己的名義,擁有價值340萬美元的股票,佔該公司22800萬美元的股份。這至少顯示了某種程度的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 52% stake in D-Wave Quantum, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在D-Wave Quantum中持有龐大的52% 的股份,這表明這是一支相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權水平給予來自更廣泛公衆的投資者一定的權力,可以影響關鍵政策決策,例如董事會構成、高管薪酬和股息支付比例。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 5 warning signs with D-Wave Quantum (at least 2 which are concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,投資風險這個永遠存在的威脅。我們已確定了 D-Wave Quantum 的5個警示信號(至少有2個令人擔憂的),了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。