With 41% Ownership in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ:METC), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 41% Ownership in Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ:METC), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Ramaco Resources' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- 10% of Ramaco Resources is held by insiders
- 鑑於機構在股票中持有大量股份,ramaco resources的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響
- 前6名股東持有公司51%的股份。
- ramaco resources的10%股份由內部人士持有
If you want to know who really controls Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ:METC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解誰真正控制ramaco resources, inc. (納斯達克:METC),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。持有公司股票數量最多的群體,準確地說約佔41%的股份,是機構。換句話說,該群體將從他們對該公司的投資中獲得最多(或者損失最多)
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$580m in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 10% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週,機構投資者獲益最多,公司市值達到了58000萬美元。投資回報率爲10%,上週的收益將更受歡迎。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ramaco Resources.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注Ramaco Resources的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ramaco Resources?
機構持股告訴我們關於Ramaco Resources的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ramaco Resources. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ramaco Resources' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Ramaco Resources中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,他們喜歡這支股票。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面Ramaco Resources的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Ramaco Resources is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Yorktown Partners LLC, with ownership of 30%. Randall Atkins is the second largest shareholder owning 6.0% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 4.9% of the company stock. Randall Atkins, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
Ramaco Resources不是機構所有。該公司最大的股東是Yorktown Partners LLC,持有30%的股份。Randall Atkins是第二大股東,擁有6.0%的普通股,BlackRock,Inc.持有約4.9%的公司股份。Randall Atkins,也是第二大股東,同時也擔任首席執行官。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Ramaco Resources
ramaco resources的內部股權所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Ramaco Resources, Inc.. Insiders have a US$59m stake in this US$580m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士持有ramaco resources, inc.的相當比例。 內部人士在這家市值爲58000萬美元的企業中持有5900萬美元的股份。看到內部人員如此投入業務真是太好了。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司擁有19%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能決定大局,但它肯定會對公司的經營產生實際影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 30%, private equity firms could influence the Ramaco Resources board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
持有30%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響ramaco resources董事會。有時,我們會看到私募股權投資公司以長揸爲主,但一般來說,它們的投資時間較短,正如名字所示,不會在公共公司中投資太多。一段時間後,它們可能會考慮出售並將資本重新配置到其他地方。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Ramaco Resources has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同團體是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險爲例 - ramaco resources存在3個警示信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。