Capital City Bank Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CCBG) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CCBG) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Capital City Bank Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 考虑到机构在股票中持有的大部分股份,capital city bank group的股价可能受到他们交易决策的影响
- 前12个股东持有业务的51%。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
If you want to know who really controls Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:CCBG), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道谁真正控制着Capital City Bank Group,Inc. (纳斯达克:CCBG),那么您需要查看其股东登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有公司45%的所有权。换句话说,该集团将获得(或损失)最多的投资回报。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$70m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 39%.
机构投资者在公司上周市值增加了7,000万美元后,前景看好。上周的收益将进一步提升股东的一年回报率,目前为39%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Capital City Bank Group.
让我们更仔细地看一下不同类型的股东可以告诉我们有关capital city bank group的信息。
![big](https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241107/0-301708dae2809632e76c3c3bf1525c93-0-2065b31f623a17960f27f78edda87530.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Capital City Bank Group?
机构持股告诉我们有关capital city bank group的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Capital City Bank Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Capital City Bank Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Capital City Bank Group在股东名册上已经有机构。事实上,他们在公司拥有可观的股份。这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时机构也会做出错误的投资,就像每个人都会犯错一样。如果两位大型机构投资者尝试同时出售股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查Capital City Bank Group的过去收益轨迹(如下图所示)。当然,也要注意还有其他因素需要考虑。
![big](https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20241107/0-301708dae2809632e76c3c3bf1525c93-1-3767c42155d194b45bce6fbcc034d562.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Capital City Bank Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO William Smith with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 5.1% of the stock.
对冲基金在 capital city bank group 持有的股份并不多。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是CEO 威廉·史密斯,持有17% 的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有大约11% 和5.1% 的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
考虑到前12名股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一的股东拥有多数。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。虽然该公司有一些分析师关注,但它可能没有得到广泛关注。因此,它可能在未来得到更多关注。
Insider Ownership Of Capital City Bank Group
capital city bank group 内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Capital City Bank Group, Inc.. Insiders have a US$118m stake in this US$605m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息显示,内部人士在capital city bank group保持着重要的持股。内部人士在这家市值60500万美元的公司中持有11800万美元的股份。看到内部人员如此投资于业务是件好事。也许值得检查一下这些内部人员最近是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 35% stake in Capital City Bank Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在capital city bank group中持有35%的股份。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决定的走向,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Capital City Bank Group is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those can't be ignored...
在考虑拥有公司的不同群体时是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。请注意,capital city bank group在我们的投资分析中显示出2个警告信号,其中1个不能忽视...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章是一般性质的。我们仅基于历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,使用公正的方法,我们的文章并非意在提供财务建议。这并不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,并且不考虑您的目标或财务状况。我们旨在为您带来基于基础数据驱动的长期聚焦分析。请注意,我们的分析可能未考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St对提及的任何股票都没有持仓。
译文内容由第三方软件翻译。