Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTNT) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 69% of the Company
Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTNT) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 69% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Fortinet implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Fortinet is 16%
- 機構對飛塔信息的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
- 前14名股東持有該公司業務的50%。
- 飛塔信息的內部所有權爲16%
Every investor in Fortinet, Inc. (NASDAQ:FTNT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 69% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
納斯達克: FTNT)的每個投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司69%的所有權。換句話說,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或蒙受最大損失)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fortinet, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解飛塔信息每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fortinet?
機構持股告訴我們有什麼關於飛塔信息的?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Fortinet already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Fortinet's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
飛塔信息已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。確實,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲有時機構會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會做一樣。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總是存在它們在一種'擁擠交易'中的風險。當這樣一種交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到飛塔信息的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事遠未結束。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Fortinet is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.7% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Two of the top three shareholders happen to be Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. That is, insiders feature higher up in the heirarchy of the company's top shareholders.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以集體行使重大權力。飛塔信息公司並非由對沖基金擁有。目前,Vanguard集團是公司最大的股東,持有8.7%的股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.4%的股份,而第三大股東持有7.4%的所有流通股份。前三名股東中有兩名恰好是首席執行官和董事會成員,相應地,內部人員在公司最大股東層級中扮演更重要的角色。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前14名股東合計持有該公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一股東對該公司有重大控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Fortinet
飛塔信息的內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Fortinet, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$9.6b stake in this US$60b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
根據我們最新的數據,內部持有飛塔信息的比例相當合理。看到內部人士對這家市值600億美元的企業有96億美元的股份是非常有趣的。看到這種投資水平是很好的。您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Fortinet. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆擁有15%的持股比例,主要由個人投資者組成,對飛塔信息有一定程度的影響力。雖然這種持股比例可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對企業政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Fortinet better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終值得考慮公司股票的不同持有群體。但要更好地了解飛塔信息,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。