Is Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL) Using Too Much Debt?
Is Hecla Mining (NYSE:HL) Using Too Much Debt?
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that Hecla Mining Company (NYSE:HL) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
David Iben表達地很準確,他說:'波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免永久性資本損失。' 因此,聰明的資金知道,債務 - 通常涉及破產 - 是評估公司風險性時的重要因素。我們注意到赫克拉礦業公司(紐交所:HL)確實在資產負債表上有債務。但真正的問題是,這筆債務是否使公司具有風險。
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務對於業務有所幫助,直到業務難以償還,無論是通過新的資本還是通過自由現金流。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東,以便控制債務。當然,債務可以是企業中的重要工具,特別是對於資本密集型行業。在審查債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。
What Is Hecla Mining's Net Debt?
赫克拉礦業的淨債務是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Hecla Mining had debt of US$569.1m, up from US$538.6m in one year. However, it does have US$24.6m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$544.6m.
下面的圖片,您可以點擊查看更多細節,顯示截至2024年6月,赫克拉礦業的債務爲56910萬美元,比一年前的53860萬美元增加。然而,公司確實有2460萬美元的現金來抵消這筆債務,導致淨債務約爲54460萬美元。
A Look At Hecla Mining's Liabilities
赫克拉礦業的負債情況
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Hecla Mining had liabilities of US$155.5m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$804.2m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$24.6m as well as receivables valued at US$49.3m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$885.8m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我們可以從最近的資產負債表看出,赫克拉礦業的短期負債爲15550萬美元,長期負債爲80420萬美元。抵消這些負債,公司持有2460萬美元現金以及價值4930萬美元的應收款項,其中12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額爲88580萬美元,超過了其現金和短期應收款項的總和。
This deficit isn't so bad because Hecla Mining is worth US$3.97b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.
這個赤字並不算太糟糕,因爲赫克拉礦業價值39.7億美元,因此如果需要的話,可能可以籌集足夠的資本來穩固其資產負債表。然而,仍然值得仔細審視其償還債務的能力。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。
Even though Hecla Mining's debt is only 2.4, its interest cover is really very low at 0.70. The main reason for this is that it has such high depreciation and amortisation. While companies often boast that these charges are non-cash, most such businesses will therefore require ongoing investment (that is not expensed.) In any case, it's safe to say the company has meaningful debt. It is well worth noting that Hecla Mining's EBIT shot up like bamboo after rain, gaining 33% in the last twelve months. That'll make it easier to manage its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Hecla Mining's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
儘管赫克拉礦業的債務僅爲2.4,但其利息覆蓋率爲0.70,實際上非常低。主要原因是公司存在如此高的折舊和攤銷費用。雖然公司通常會誇耀這些費用是非現金支出,但大多數這類企業因此需要持續的投資(不計爲支出)。無論如何,可以肯定地說公司存在着實質性的債務。值得注意的是,赫克拉礦業的息稅前利潤(EBIt)在過去十二個月中大幅增長,增長了33%。這將使其更容易管理債務。毫無疑問,我們對債務的了解主要來自資產負債表。但未來收益,勝過一切,將決定赫克拉礦業維持健康資產負債表的能力。如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現這份關於分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Hecla Mining burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
但我們最後的考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司無法用紙面利潤償還債務;它需要真金白銀。因此,合乎邏輯的下一步是看看EBIt中實際自由現金流所佔比例。在過去三年中,赫克拉礦業燒掉了大量現金。儘管這可能是爲了增長而支出的結果,但確實使得債務更加風險化。
Our View
我們的觀點
Neither Hecla Mining's ability to convert EBIT to free cash flow nor its interest cover gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But its EBIT growth rate tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that Hecla Mining is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Hecla Mining that you should be aware of before investing here.
赫克拉礦業將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的能力以及其利息覆蓋率都沒有給予我們信懇智能,使其具備承擔更多債務的能力。但其EBIt增長率卻講述了一個完全不同的故事,並表明了一些韌性。從以上提到的所有角度來看,赫克拉礦業似乎是一項相對有風險的投資,因爲其債務情況。這並不一定是件壞事,因爲槓桿可以提升股本回報率,但這是需要注意的事項。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表內-遠非如此。例如,我們發現了赫克拉礦業的2個警示信號,您在此處投資之前應該注意。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。