Investors Could Be Concerned With TriMas' (NASDAQ:TRS) Returns On Capital
Investors Could Be Concerned With TriMas' (NASDAQ:TRS) Returns On Capital
Ignoring the stock price of a company, what are the underlying trends that tell us a business is past the growth phase? A business that's potentially in decline often shows two trends, a return on capital employed (ROCE) that's declining, and a base of capital employed that's also declining. Trends like this ultimately mean the business is reducing its investments and also earning less on what it has invested. And from a first read, things don't look too good at TriMas (NASDAQ:TRS), so let's see why.
忽略一家公司的股價,有哪些潛在趨勢可以告訴我們一家企業已經走出了增長階段?一家潛在處於衰退中的企業通常會展現出兩種趨勢,一個是資本僱用回報率(ROCE)在下降,另一個是資本僱用基數也在下降。這樣的趨勢最終意味着企業正在減少投資,同時也在投資上獲得的利潤更少。從初步閱讀來看,TriMas(納斯達克代碼:TRS)的情況並不樂觀,讓我們看看爲什麼。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for TriMas:
對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人,它衡量公司從其業務中的資本僱用中可以產生多少稅前利潤。分析師使用這個公式來計算TriMas的ROCE:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。
0.051 = US$62m ÷ (US$1.4b - US$154m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.051 = 6200萬美元 ÷ (14億美元 - 1.54億美元)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
Thus, TriMas has an ROCE of 5.1%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Packaging industry average of 8.8%.
因此,TriMas的ROCE爲5.1%。最終,這是一個較低的回報率,並且低於包裝行業平均水平8.8%。
In the above chart we have measured TriMas' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for TriMas .
在上面的圖表中,我們已經測量了TriMas在之前的資本回報率與其之前的表現進行了對比,但未來可能更爲重要。如果您想了解分析師對未來的預測,您應該查看我們爲TriMas提供的免費分析師報告。
What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us
儘管如此,當我們看 enphase energy (納斯達克股票代碼:ENPH) 的時候,它似乎並沒有完全符合這些要求。
There is reason to be cautious about TriMas, given the returns are trending downwards. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 7.8% that they were earning five years ago. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on TriMas becoming one if things continue as they have.
對於TriMas有理由持謹慎態度,因爲回報率呈下降趨勢。遺憾的是,資本回報率已經從五年前的7.8%下降,而資本運用方面,該企業使用的資本大致與那時相同。展現這些特徵的公司往往不會縮小規模,但可能已經成熟,而且正面臨來自競爭的利潤壓力。因此,由於這些趨勢通常不利於創造超高回報,如果事情繼續下去,我們不太看好TriMas會成爲這樣一家企業。
The Bottom Line On TriMas' ROCE
TriMas的資本回報率結論
In summary, it's unfortunate that TriMas is generating lower returns from the same amount of capital. It should come as no surprise then that the stock has fallen 19% over the last five years, so it looks like investors are recognizing these changes. With underlying trends that aren't great in these areas, we'd consider looking elsewhere.
總而言之,不幸的是TriMas從同等資本中獲得更低的回報。因此,過去五年來股價下跌了19%,因此投資者似乎已經意識到這些變化。考慮到這些方面的不利趨勢,我們可能要考慮尋找其他投資機會。
TriMas does have some risks, we noticed 3 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about.
TriMas確實存在一些風險,我們注意到有3個警示信號(還有一個有點令人擔憂),我們認爲您應該知道。
While TriMas isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
雖然TriMas的回報率不是最高的,請查看這份免費名單,其中列出了具有穩健資產負債表並獲得高股本回報率的公司。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。