Royalty Pharma Plc (NASDAQ:RPRX) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 72%
Royalty Pharma Plc (NASDAQ:RPRX) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 72%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Royalty Pharma's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 52% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
- Insiders own 13% of Royalty Pharma
- 鑑於機構在股票中持有大量股份,royalty pharma的股價可能受到它們交易決策的影響
- 前十大股東持有該業務的52%。
- 內部人員持有royalty pharma 13%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Royalty Pharma plc (NASDAQ:RPRX) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 72% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下納斯達克:RPRX royalty pharma 的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到,機構持有公司的絕大部分股權,佔比達到72%。換句話說,這個群體將從他們投資公司中獲得最多(或者損失最多)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Royalty Pharma.
讓我們仔細看一下,看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關Royalty Pharma的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Royalty Pharma?
機構投資者對Royalty Pharma的持股告訴我們什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Royalty Pharma. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Royalty Pharma, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Royalty Pharma中擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。它們也有時候犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某支股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Royalty Pharma的歷史收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也請記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Royalty Pharma. Mario Giuliani is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.5% and 8.1% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Pablo Legorreta directly holds 0.8% of the total shares outstanding.
投資者應該注意,機構實際擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大權力。對於royalty pharma,對沖基金並未持有過多股份。馬里奧·朱利安尼目前是公司最大的股東,持有12%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.5%和8.1%的股份。此外,公司CEO帕布羅·萊戈雷塔直接持有總流通股份的0.8%。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Royalty Pharma
royalty pharma的內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Royalty Pharma plc. Insiders own US$2.2b worth of shares in the US$16b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有的royalty pharma plc的股份相當可觀。 內部持有價值22億美元的股份,佔總市值160億美元的公司。 這是相當有意義的。 大多數人會認爲這表明在這種規模的公司中,與股東有很好的一致性。 您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Royalty Pharma. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通大衆,通常爲個人投資者,在royalty pharma中持有14%的股份。 雖然這種持股比例可能不足以左右政策決定以他們的利益,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Royalty Pharma better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Royalty Pharma is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
值得考慮不同持有公司股票的群體。但要更好地了解 royalty pharma,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。要注意,Royalty Pharma 在我們的投資分析中顯示出 3 個警示信號,您應該了解...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。