Institutional Investors May Overlook Amcor Plc's (NYSE:AMCR) Recent US$1.2b Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Institutional Investors May Overlook Amcor Plc's (NYSE:AMCR) Recent US$1.2b Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Amcor's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 47% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 考慮到機構對股票的大股份,amcor的股價可能容易受到它們交易決策的影響
- 25位投資者擁有華力創通的多數股份,佔有47%的所有權。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
Every investor in Amcor plc (NYSE:AMCR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 64% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
在Amcor plc(NYSE:AMCR)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。持有最大股份的是擁有64%所有權的機構。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 7.4% in value last week. However, the 19% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧錢,尤其是看到上週自己持有的股份貶值了7.4%的機構投資者。然而,一年19%的股東回報率可能已經減輕了衝擊。然而,我們會假設他們將對未來的弱點保持警惕。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Amcor.
讓我們仔細看一下,不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於amcor的什麼情況。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amcor?
機構所有權告訴我們有關Amcor的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Amcor already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Amcor's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Amcor已經有機構在股東名冊上。確實,他們在公司中擁有一定的股份。這表明專業投資者中對其有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅憑這一事實來依賴,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們參與的「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣一次交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Amcor的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更加複雜的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Amcor is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 7.5% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.6% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 6.4% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。amcor不是對沖基金的股東。目前,先鋒集團擁有公司7.5%的流通股,是該公司最大的股東。黑石集團擁有6.6%的普通股,是第二大股東,道富銀行全球貨幣顧問公司持有約公司股份6.4%。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Amcor
amcor的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Amcor plc in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$56m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,Amcor plc的內部人士以自己的名義擁有不到1%的股份。 由於公司規模如此之大,我們不認爲內部人士會擁有大量的股份。 總共,他們擁有5600萬美元的股票。 在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出股票可能更有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in Amcor. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Amcor持有36%的股份。 儘管這種所有權規模相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Amcor you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司究竟由誰擁有很有趣。但要真正獲取洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。舉個例子:我們發現amcor存在2個警告信號,你應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。