With 60% Ownership in Porch Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRCH), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 60% Ownership in Porch Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRCH), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Porch Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders own 21% of Porch Group
- 機構持有Porch Group的大量股份意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
- 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
- 內部持有Porch Group 21%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Porch Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRCH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 60% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解真正控制Porch Group, Inc. (納斯達克:PRCH)的人,重要的是了解業務的所有權結構。 擁有公司最多股份的是機構,準確地說是約60%。 也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者出現下行),這一組織將獲益最多(或者損失最大)。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 73% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 226%.
結果,上週公司股價上漲73%,機構投資者從中獲得了最大的回報。上週的收益將進一步提高股東的一年回報,目前爲226%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Porch Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Porch Group的每一種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Porch Group?
機構持股告訴我們關於Porch Group的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Porch Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Porch Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,Porch Group確實有機構投資者,並持有公司股票的大部分。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,始終存在一種風險,即他們的交易可能過於擁擠。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Porch Group的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事不止如此。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Porch Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Matthew Ehrlichman is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.8% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股票的一半,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。Porch Group不是對沖基金持有的。公司首席執行官馬修·厄利希曼持有19%的流通股,是最大的股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的9.8%和5.0%。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進一步了解,前8大股東持有該公司約51%的註冊股份,這意味着除了更大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Porch Group
Porch Group的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Porch Group, Inc.. Insiders own US$46m worth of shares in the US$222m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部人員擁有Porch Group,Inc.相當比例的股份。內部人員在這家價值22200萬美元的公司中擁有4600萬美元的股份。我們會說這顯示了與股東的利益保持一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人員可能是創立業務的。您可以點擊此處查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Porch Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有20%股權的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Porch Group有一定的影響力。雖然這一所有權規模可能不足以影響他們對一項政策決策的支持,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Porch Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Porch Group has 4 warning signs (and 2 which don't sit too well with us) we think you should know about.
考慮到在公司股份中擁股的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解Porch Group,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例 - Porch Group有4個警示信號(還有2個讓我們不太滿意的信號),我們認爲您應該了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。