With 83% Ownership, Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMAT) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 83% Ownership, Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMAT) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Applied Materials' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 49% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 考慮到機構在該股票中所佔的大股份,應用材料的股價可能容易受到他們的交易決策的影響
- 共有25家投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,達到49%的持股比例。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
If you want to know who really controls Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMAT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 83% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解誰真正控制着納斯達克上的應用材料公司(NASDAQ:AMAT),那麼您需要查看其股東登記簿的構成。持有最大股份的是擁有83%股權的機構。換句話說,該機構有可能從對該公司的投資中獲得最大利潤(或蒙受最大虧損)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Applied Materials.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了應用材料的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Applied Materials?
機構持股告訴我們什麼有關應用材料?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Applied Materials does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Applied Materials, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,應用材料確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司的股票的一大部分。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的信譽。 但是,最好謹慎依賴於來自機構投資者的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。 如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,則股價下跌幅度較大並不少見。 因此,值得檢查應用材料的過去收益軌跡(如下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Applied Materials is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 9.6% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.2% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 5.0% of the company stock.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過半數的公司股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要權力。 應用材料並不是由對沖基金持有。 從我們的數據來看,最大股東是BlackRock,擁有9.6%的流通股。 第二大股東是The Vanguard Group,持有9.2%的普通股,Capital Research and Management Company持有約5.0%的公司股票。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Applied Materials
應用材料的內部持股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that Applied Materials, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$344m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
根據我們的信息,應用材料公司內部股東持有公司不到1%的股份。 由於規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部股東持有股票的大部分。總共,他們持有價值34400萬美元的股票。也許最近的買賣同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部股東是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Applied Materials. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在應用材料公司持有17%的股份。 儘管這種所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Applied Materials better, we need to consider many other factors.
考慮到持有公司股票的不同群體總是值得思考。但要更好地理解應用材料,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。