Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE:LOW) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 77% of the Company
Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE:LOW) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 77% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lowe's Companies' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 46% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構持有較高的股份意味着勞氏的股價對他們的交易行爲更爲敏感
- 前25名股東持有46%的股份。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
A look at the shareholders of Lowe's Companies, Inc. (NYSE:LOW) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 77% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一下勞氏公司(NYSE:LOW)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。持有該公司股份最多的群體,具體來說約爲77%,是機構。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lowe's Companies.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了勞氏公司的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lowe's Companies?
機構所有權告訴我們有關勞氏公司的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lowe's Companies. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lowe's Companies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在勞氏公司中擁有相當多的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會投資失敗,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看一下勞氏公司的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Lowe's Companies is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.5% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.8% and 4.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者擁有超過半數已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。勞氏目前不被對沖基金擁有。先鋒集團目前是最大的股東,持有9.5%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的6.8%和4.3%。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Lowe's Companies
機構持有勞氏公司股份
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Lowe's Companies, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$157m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,勞氏的內部持有者僅擁有該公司不到1%的股份。因爲這是一家大公司,我們只會期望內部持有者擁有很小的一部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值15700萬美元的股份。在這種情況下,看看這些內部持有者是否一直在買入或賣出股票可能會更有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lowe's Companies. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有23%股份的一般大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對勞氏公司有一定程度的影響力。雖然這種所有權比較大,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lowe's Companies better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Lowe's Companies is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those can't be ignored...
考慮到在一家公司中擁有股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但要更好地了解勞氏,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,勞氏正顯示出3個警示信號,其中1個是不能被忽視的...
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。