CSX (NASDAQ:CSX) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
CSX (NASDAQ:CSX) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
伯克希爾哈撒韋公司的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李錄在提到'最大的投資風險不在於價格的波動,而在於您是否會遭受永久性的資本損失'時毫不掩飾。當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。我們可以看到CSX運輸公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CSX)確實在業務中使用了債務。但這些債務會讓股東擔心嗎?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業無力償還貸款,則存在着風險。在最壞的情況下,如果企業無法償還其債權人,那麼它將會破產。然而,一個更爲普遍的(但仍然非常昂貴)情況是,一家公司必須以便宜的股價稀釋股東,以便控制債務。話雖如此,最常見的情況是,企業合理地管理其債務,並使其受益。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先同時考慮現金和債務水平。
How Much Debt Does CSX Carry?
CSX承擔了多少債務?
As you can see below, CSX had US$18.6b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. On the flip side, it has US$1.66b in cash leading to net debt of about US$17.0b.
正如您所見,2024年9月,CSX公司負債186億美元,與前一年大致相同。您可以點擊圖表查看更詳細的信息。另一方面,公司有16.6億美元的現金,淨債務約爲170億美元。
How Strong Is CSX's Balance Sheet?
CSX的資產負債表有多強?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that CSX had liabilities of US$2.57b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$27.6b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$1.66b and US$1.41b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$27.1b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,CSX一年內到期的負債爲25.7億美元,而到期日超過一年的負債爲276億美元。另一方面,它手頭有16.6億美元的現金和14.1億美元的一年內到期應收款。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收款合計高出271億美元。
CSX has a very large market capitalization of US$64.9b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.
CSX的市值非常高,爲649億美元,所以如果有需要,它很可能籌集資金改善其資產負債表。但很明顯,我們絕對應該仔細判斷它是否能夠管理債務而不發生股份稀釋。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
BJ批發俱樂部控股公司的淨債務只有EBITDA的0.62倍。而其EBIT輕鬆覆蓋其利息費用,比例爲12.6倍。因此,我們對其超級保守的債務使用感到相當放心。雖然BJ批發俱樂部控股公司在EBIT方面沒有取得太多進展,但至少其盈利保持穩定。當分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯然的切入點。但歸根結底,企業未來的盈利能力將決定BJ批發俱樂部控股公司能否隨着時間的推移加強資產負債表。因此,如果你要關注未來,可以查看一下這份免費的分析報告,了解分析師的盈利預測。
CSX's net debt of 2.4 times EBITDA suggests graceful use of debt. And the alluring interest cover (EBIT of 7.4 times interest expense) certainly does not do anything to dispel this impression. Importantly CSX's EBIT was essentially flat over the last twelve months. Ideally it can diminish its debt load by kick-starting earnings growth. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine CSX's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
CSX的淨負債爲EBITDA的2.4倍,表明它在債務使用上很得體。而誘人的利息保障倍數(EBIt爲利息支出的7.4倍)確實沒有消除這種印象。重要的是,CSX的EBIt在過去12個月基本持平。理想情況下,它可以通過啓動盈利增長來減少債務負擔。毫無疑問,我們最多從資產負債表上了解債務狀況。但更重要的是,未來盈利將決定CSX維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師盈利預測的免費報告。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, CSX recorded free cash flow worth 57% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
但我們最後的考慮也很重要,因爲公司無法用虛擬利潤償還債務;它需要現金。所以值得查看EBIt中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去最近的三年中,CSX的自由現金流價值相當於EBIt的57%,這大致正常,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅收。這份自由現金流將使公司處於良好位置,可以在適當時償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Both CSX's ability to to cover its interest expense with its EBIT and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow gave us comfort that it can handle its debt. On the other hand, its net debt to EBITDA makes us a little less comfortable about its debt. When we consider all the factors mentioned above, we do feel a bit cautious about CSX's use of debt. While we appreciate debt can enhance returns on equity, we'd suggest that shareholders keep close watch on its debt levels, lest they increase. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for CSX you should be aware of.
考慮到CSX用EBIT償付利息的能力以及將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流的能力,我們相信它可以應對其債務。另一方面,其淨債務與EBITDA的比率讓我們對其債務感到有些不安。綜合考慮以上提到的所有因素,我們對CSX的債務使用感到有些謹慎。雖然我們認爲債務可以提高股東權益回報率,但我們建議股東密切關注其債務水平,以防其增加。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要重點關注的區域。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。案例證明:我們發現CSX存在1個警示信號,您應當注意。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。