Institutional Investors Are Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s (NYSE:ZETA) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$217m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s (NYSE:ZETA) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$217m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Zeta Global Holdings' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 16% of Zeta Global Holdings is held by insiders
- 鑑於機構對股票持有的數量較大,Zeta Global Holdings的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響
- 總共有16家投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔50%的所有權。
- Zeta Global Holdings有16%的股份由內部股東持有
Every investor in Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (NYSE:ZETA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 64% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (NYSE:ZETA)的每位投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。擁有該公司大部分股份的是機構,準確地說,約佔64%。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$6.5b in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 228% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週,該公司市值達到65億美元后,機構投資者獲益最多。目前一年的投資回報率已達228%,上週的收益應該是受歡迎的。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zeta Global Holdings.
讓我們更仔細地看看,不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關 Zeta Global Holdings 的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zeta Global Holdings?
機構持有權告訴我們關於 Zeta Global Holdings 的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Zeta Global Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Zeta Global Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到 Zeta Global Holdings 的確有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯,就像每個人都會犯錯一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,很常見會出現股價大幅下跌。因此,值得查看 Zeta Global Holdings 的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Zeta Global Holdings. The company's CEO David Steinberg is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 8.1% and 6.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
由於機構投資者持有超過一半已發行股份,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。 我們注意到對Zeta Global Holdings沒有任何實質性投資的對沖基金。 公司首席執行官大衛·斯坦伯格擁有12%的優先股,是最大的股東。 分別擁有8.1%和6.8%的優先股,The Vanguard Group, Inc.和BlackRock, Inc.分別是第二和第三大股東。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的了解,我們發現前16名股東共同擁有公司50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司有足夠的控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of Zeta Global Holdings
Zeta Global Holdings內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Zeta Global Holdings Corp.. It has a market capitalization of just US$6.5b, and insiders have US$1.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們的信息表明,內部人士在Zeta Global Holdings Corp.中持有大量股份。其市值僅爲65億美元,內部人士名下擁有價值10億美元的股份。這相當可觀。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望查看這個免費圖表,顯示內部人士最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有該公司20%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然這一所有權規模相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Zeta Global Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Zeta Global Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考慮公司的股東群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解Zeta Global Holdings,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮投資風險的永遠存在的威脅。我們已經確定了Zeta Global Holdings的1個警告信號,理解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。