With 86% Institutional Ownership, Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 86% Institutional Ownership, Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Vertiv Holdings Co implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 21 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在Vertiv Holdings Co的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價具有重要影響力。
- 共有21名投資者持有該公司的大部分股權,佔有50%的所有權
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着Vertiv Holdings Co(紐交所:VRT),重要的是要了解該企業的所有權結構。持有最大股份的是機構,擁有86%的所有權。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該機構將受益最多(或如果股價下跌將損失最大)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Vertiv Holdings Co.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對Vertiv Holdings Co有什麼信息可以告訴我們。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Vertiv Holdings Co?
機構持股向我們展示了關於Vertiv Holdings Co的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Vertiv Holdings Co does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Vertiv Holdings Co, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,Vertiv Holdings Co確實有機構投資者;而且他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。 但我們不能僅憑這個事實就下判斷,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。 如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一支股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。 因此,值得檢查Vertiv Holdings Co過去的盈利軌跡(以下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Vertiv Holdings Co is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.9% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.0% and 6.0% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過半數發行股份,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。Vertiv Holdings Co不是由對沖基金持有。BlackRock,Inc.目前是該公司最大的股東,持有9.9%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.0%和6.0%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步調查,我們發現前21名股東擁有公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重大控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Vertiv Holdings Co
Vertiv Holdings Co的內部股權佔有情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Vertiv Holdings Co insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$190m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,Vertiv Holdings Co內部人士擁有公司不到1%的股份。但我們注意到,內部人士可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值19000萬美元的股份。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是否一直在買賣可能會更有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司12%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略它們。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但是肯定會對公司的運營產生影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Vertiv Holdings Co better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Vertiv Holdings Co that you should be aware of.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解Vertiv Holdings Co,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了有關Vertiv Holdings Co的1個警示信號,您應該了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。