Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE:WBS) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE:WBS) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Webster Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構對韋伯斯特金融的大量持股意味着它們對公司股價有着重要影響
- 共有13個投資者擁有該公司的大多數股份,持股比例爲50%。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls Webster Financial Corporation (NYSE:WBS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着韋伯斯特金融公司(紐交所:WBS),那麼您需要看一看其股東登記表。機構持有公司87%的股份,擁有最多的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Webster Financial.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大查看韋伯斯特金融的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Webster Financial?
機構所有權能告訴我們有關韋伯斯特金融的什麼信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Webster Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Webster Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
韋伯斯特金融已經有機構持有股份。事實上,它們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果多家機構同時改變他們對某支股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看韋伯斯特金融的下面的營收歷史數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Webster Financial. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.0% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 5.1% of the company stock.
機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此他們可以共同影響董事會的決定。對於韋伯斯特金融,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。該公司最大的股東是萬得集團,持有公司11%的股份。黑石集團持有9.0%的普通股,而FMR LLC持有公司5.1%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
通過股權調查,我們發現前13名股東在公司中擁有50%的股權,表明沒有單一股東對該公司具有重大控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Webster Financial
韋伯斯特金融的內部股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that Webster Financial Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$82m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,韋伯斯特金融公司內部持有不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此讓內部持有公司的大部分股份是令人驚訝的。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同持有價值8200萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。可以說最近的買賣和持有同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Webster Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
佔有12%股份的一般公衆,主要是個人投資者,對韋伯斯特金融有一定影響力。雖然這種所有權相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Webster Financial .
我發現查看一個公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意韋伯斯特金融存在的一個警示信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。