Institutional Investors in Alerus Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:ALRS) Lost 14% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Institutional Investors in Alerus Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:ALRS) Lost 14% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Alerus Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 20 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在alerus financial的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價具有重大影響
- 總共有20位股東持有該公司的50%股權
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
A look at the shareholders of Alerus Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:ALRS) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 49% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一下alerus financial corporation(納斯達克:alrs)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。 機構持有該公司49%的股份,持股數量最大。 換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$469m last week. However, the 22% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
上週公司市值下降至46900萬美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。然而,股東們獲得的22%的一年回報可能有助於減輕他們的損失。然而,我們可能會假設他們將密切關注未來的弱點。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Alerus Financial.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於alerus financial的什麼信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alerus Financial?
機構持股告訴我們關於Alerus Financial的什麼信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Alerus Financial. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Alerus Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Alerus Financial擁有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看Alerus Financial下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Alerus Financial is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Alerus Financial Corp., Asset Management Arm with 11% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 4.7% of the company stock.
alerus financial不被對沖基金擁有。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是alerus financial公司,資產管理部門持有11%的股份。第二大股東是黑石集團,擁有8.5%的普通股,而先鋒集團持有該公司股份的約4.7%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 20 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記表,我們可以看到前20名股東控制着50%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Alerus Financial
alerus financial的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Alerus Financial Corporation. In their own names, insiders own US$32m worth of stock in the US$469m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根據我們最新的數據,內部人士擁有Alerus Financial Corporation的部分股份。在他們自己的名義下,內部人士擁有價值3200萬美元的股票,佔據了總市值46900萬美元的公司。這至少顯示出了某種程度的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 40% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Alerus Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
作爲持有40%股份的,一般公衆,主要是個人投資者,對Alerus Financial有一定程度的影響力。儘管這個群體不能一言九鼎,但肯定能在公司的運行方式上產生實質性影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Alerus Financial has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司所有者是非常有趣的。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。舉個例子,看風險- alerus financial有2個警示標誌,我們認爲你應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。