Insiders Own 29% of IFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) Shares but Retail Investors Control 36% of the Company
Insiders Own 29% of IFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY) Shares but Retail Investors Control 36% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over iFAST by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 55% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- 29% of iFAST is held by insiders
- 零售投資者對奕豐集團的重要控制權意味着普通公衆在影響管理和治理決策方面擁有更大的權力
- 前4大股東持有55%的業務。
- 奕豐集團29%的股份爲內部人持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of iFAST Corporation Ltd. (SGX:AIY), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 36% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着奕豐集團 (新加坡交易所:AIY),重要的是理解業務的所有權結構。擁有最大餅塊的是持有36%股權的零售投資者群體。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And individual insiders on the other hand have a 29% ownership in the company. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.
另一方面,個別內部人員擁有該公司29%的所有權。 一般來說,隨着公司的發展,機構將增加其所有權。相反,內部人員通常會隨着時間的推移減少他們的所有權。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about iFAST.
讓我們仔細看一看股東的不同類型能告訴我們關於奕豐集團的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iFAST?
機構所有權告訴我們關於奕豐集團的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in iFAST. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at iFAST's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在奕豐集團中持有相當大比例的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可靠性。但是最好不要過分依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時候會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,看看下面的奕豐集團的營業收入歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in iFAST. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Chung Chun Lim with 19% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 17% and 12%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
對奕豐集團沒有太多股票的對沖基金。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是CEO鍾振霖,持有19%的已發行股份。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的17%和12%。
On looking further, we found that 55% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步查看,我們發現前4大股東擁有該公司55%的股份。換言之,這些股東對公司的決策有着重要的影響。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of iFAST
奕豐集團的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of iFAST Corporation Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just S$2.2b, and insiders have S$640m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部持股者擁有奕豐集團有限公司的合理比例。其市值僅爲22億新元,內部持股者名下持有64000萬新元的股份。這相當重要。看到這種投資水平是好事。您可以在這裏查看這些持股者最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in iFAST. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有奕豐集團有限公司36%的股份。雖然這個群體可能不能決定事情,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實質影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the iFAST stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
奕豐集團的13%股份似乎由私人公司擁有。單單從這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查擁有這些私人公司的人。有時內部人士或其他相關方可能通過單獨的私人公司持有公共公司股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。