Douglas Dynamics (NYSE:PLOW) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
Douglas Dynamics (NYSE:PLOW) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (NYSE:PLOW) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
伯克希爾·哈撒韋( Berkshire Hathaway) 背書的外部基金經理李錄(Charlie Munger)毫不掩飾地表示:「最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是您是否會遭受資本永久性損失。」因此,看來聰明人心知肚明,債務—通常涉及破產—是評估公司風險時的一個非常重要因素。值得注意的是,Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (紐交所:PLOW) 確實負債。但這債務是否會讓股東擔憂呢?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
當企業無法輕鬆通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金來履行欠債時,債務和其他負債對企業會產生風險。如果事情變得非常糟糕,放貸人可以控制企業。然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,它必須在低價籌集新的股權資本,從而永久性地稀釋股東的權益。當然,對於企業而言,債務可以是一個重要的工具,特別是對於資本密集型的企業。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用情況時,我們首先考慮現金和債務總額。
What Is Douglas Dynamics's Debt?
Douglas Dynamics的負債情況是什麼?
As you can see below, Douglas Dynamics had US$217.0m of debt at September 2024, down from US$293.6m a year prior. However, it also had US$8.41m in cash, and so its net debt is US$208.5m.
正如您下面所看到的,2024年9月,Douglas Dynamics的債務爲21700萬美元,低於前一年的29360萬美元。然而,它也持有841萬美元現金,因此淨債務爲20850萬美元。
How Strong Is Douglas Dynamics' Balance Sheet?
道格拉斯動力公司的資產負債表有多強?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Douglas Dynamics had liabilities of US$147.5m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$257.3m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$8.41m as well as receivables valued at US$153.1m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$243.3m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
從最近的資產負債表可以看出,道格拉斯動力公司有到期的短期負債爲14750萬美元,到期期限超過1年的負債爲25730萬美元。 抵消這些義務的是,該公司擁有八千四百一十萬美元的現金以及在12個月內到期的應收賬款價值一億五千三百一十萬美元。 因此,其負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的總和高出兩億四千三百三十萬美元。
Douglas Dynamics has a market capitalization of US$601.8m, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
道格拉斯動力公司的市值爲60180萬美元,因此在需要時很可能可以籌集資金來改善其資產負債表。 但我們絕對希望留意其債務帶來過高風險的跡象。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過查看淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比以及計算其利息支出由收益前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋的程度來度量一家公司的債務負載相對於其收益能力的程度。此方法的優點在於我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(以淨債務爲EBITDA)以及與該債務相關的實際利息支出(以其利息覆蓋倍數計算)。
Douglas Dynamics has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.1 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 2.9 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Even more troubling is the fact that Douglas Dynamics actually let its EBIT decrease by 3.4% over the last year. If that earnings trend continues the company will face an uphill battle to pay off its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Douglas Dynamics's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
道格拉斯動力公司的債務與EBITDA比率爲3.1,其EBIt覆蓋了2.9倍的利息支出。 這一起表明,雖然我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲它可以應付當前的槓桿。 還更加令人擔憂的是,道格拉斯動力公司實際上讓其EBIt在過去一年內下降了3.4%。 如果這種盈利趨勢持續下去,該公司將面臨清償債務的艱鉅任務。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。 但最終決定道格拉斯動力公司未來能否保持健康資產負債表的,更多的是未來的盈利。 因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師盈利預測的免費報告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. In the last three years, Douglas Dynamics's free cash flow amounted to 45% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.
最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤僅僅不夠。 因此,邏輯的步驟是查看與實際自由現金流匹配的EBIt比例。 在過去的三年中,道格拉斯動力公司的自由現金流佔其EBIt的45%,低於我們的預期。 就償還債務而言,這不是一個好消息。
Our View
我們的觀點
Douglas Dynamics's interest cover was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered cast it in a significantly better light. But on the bright side, its ability to to convert EBIT to free cash flow isn't too shabby at all. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Douglas Dynamics's debt poses some risks to the business. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Douglas Dynamics (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.
道格拉斯動力公司的利息覆蓋率在這一分析中實際上是一個真正的負面,儘管我們考慮的其他因素使其呈現出了明顯更好的光景。但是從好的一面來看,它將EBIt轉換爲自由現金流的能力實際上也相當不錯。綜合考慮以上因素,我們確實認爲道格拉斯動力公司的債務對業務構成了一定風險。因此,儘管這種槓桿確實提高了股本回報率,但我們真的不希望看到它從這個水平增加。資產負債表顯然是您在分析債務時需要關注的領域。然而,並非所有投資風險都在資產負債表中—遠非如此。這些風險可能很難發現。每家公司都有這些風險,並且我們已經發現了道格拉斯動力公司的2個預警信號(其中1個令人擔憂!)您應該知道。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。