share_log

Despite Recent Sales, Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ:ERIE) Insiders Own 41% Shares but Recent Downturn May Have Set Them Back

Despite Recent Sales, Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ:ERIE) Insiders Own 41% Shares but Recent Downturn May Have Set Them Back

儘管最近有銷售,伊瑞保險公司(納斯達克:ERIE)的內部持股比例爲41%,但最近的下降可能讓他們蒙受損失。
Simply Wall St ·  10/30 01:52

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Erie Indemnity's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 3 shareholders own 53% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 似乎內部人員對伊瑞保險的增長有着極大的利益,這可以從他們擁有的大量股份中看出
  • 前三大股東擁有該公司53%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ:ERIE) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 41% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一看伊瑞保險公司(納斯達克:ERIE)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。個別內部人員擁有41%的股份,是公司中持股最多的人群。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者如果出現下行),這個群體將得利最多(或者損失最多)。

Even though insiders have sold shares recently, the group owns the most numbers of shares in the company. Following last week's 5.8% decline in share price, the group also suffered the most losses.

儘管內部人士最近賣出了股票,但該集團擁有公司中數量最多的股份。在上週股價下跌了5.8%後,該集團也遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Erie Indemnity.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點放在伊瑞保險的不同所有權群體上。

big
NasdaqGS:ERIE Ownership Breakdown October 29th 2024
納斯達克ERIE 2024年10月29日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Erie Indemnity?

機構投資者持有的伊瑞保險股份比較多。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的信譽。然而,依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證最好還是謹慎一些,因爲他們也有錯誤的時候。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一個股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得關注的是伊瑞保險以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Erie Indemnity already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Erie Indemnity's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

伊瑞保險已經在股東名單上有機構。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可以表明公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的信譽。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總有一種可能性,即它們是在進行一種「擁擠的交易」。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到伊瑞保險的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事還有更多。

big
NasdaqGS:ERIE Earnings and Revenue Growth October 29th 2024
納斯達克:伊瑞保險2024年10月29日的收益和營業收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Erie Indemnity. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Thomas Hagen with 33% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

對於伊瑞保險,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是托馬斯·哈根,持有33%的股份。爲了更好地理解,第二大股東持有約11%的流通股份,緊隨其後的是第三大股東持有9.4%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。

Insider Ownership Of Erie Indemnity

持有16%的普通公衆投資者,主要是個人投資者,對伊瑞保險有一定影響力。雖然這個集團不能決定公司的命運,但他們肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Erie Indemnity Company. Insiders own US$9.5b worth of shares in the US$23b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部股東擁有伊瑞保險公司相當比例的股份。內部股東在這家市值230億美元的公司中擁有95億美元的股份。這相當有意義。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看,看看這些內部股東最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Erie Indemnity. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆,通常是個體投資者,在伊瑞保險持有17%的股份。儘管這種所有權很可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 11%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私營企業擁有已發行股份的11%。私營企業可能是相關方。有時,內部人員可能通過持有私營企業的受益而對一家公衆公司有興趣,而不是作爲個人。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的一個方面。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論