Astrana Health, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ASTH) Institutional Investors Lost 6.7% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Astrana Health, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ASTH) Institutional Investors Lost 6.7% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Astrana Health's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Insider ownership in Astrana Health is 12%
- 機構持有份額高意味着 Astrana Health 的股價對它們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 總共有8個投資者擁有該公司的52%所有權。
- Astrana Health 的內部所有權爲12%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Astrana Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:ASTH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 48% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着 Astrana Health, Inc. (納斯達克股票代碼:ASTH),重要的是要了解企業的所有權結構。機構持有了48% 的股份,這家企業中機構擁有最多的股份。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下降風險)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.7b last week. Still, the 85% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
上週公司的市值下跌至27億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最嚴重的群體。然而,85%的一年漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。然而,他們應該警惕未來進一步的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Astrana Health, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Astrana Health的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Astrana Health?
機構持股告訴我們有關Astrana Health的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Astrana Health. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Astrana Health's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Astrana Health中持有相當數量的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者似乎驗證的信息。他們也有時會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Astrana Health下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Astrana Health. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Allied Physicians of California IPA with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 9.6% of the stock. In addition, we found that Brandon Sim, the CEO has 3.3% of the shares allocated to their name.
在Astrana Health中,對沖基金持有的股份不多。通過我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是加利福尼亞IPA醫生聯盟,持有15%的股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約13%和9.6%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Brandon Sim擁有3.3%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Astrana Health
Astrana Health的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Astrana Health, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$2.7b, and insiders have US$330m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
內部人士擁有Astrana Health, Inc.相當比例的股份。 它的市值僅爲27億美元,內部人士自己名下的股票價值爲33000萬美元。 這相當可觀。 大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。 您可能希望訪問此免費圖表,顯示內部人員最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Astrana Health. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
佔有25%的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在Astrana Health擁有一定的影響力。 雖然這個群體可能無法直接決定事務,但肯定會對公司的運營產生實質性影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 15%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,非上市公司擁有已發行股份的15%。也許有必要深入研究一下。如果相關方,如內部人員,在這些私人公司中擁有利益,那麼應該在年報中發表說明。非上市公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Astrana Health better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Astrana Health has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解Astrana Health,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉個例子,承擔風險 - Astrana Health有1個警告標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。